Schwartz-Tallard v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association et al
ORDER Granting 4 Motion to Extend Deadline. All Defendants answer due 9/26/17. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/13/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
IRENE MICHELLE SCHWARTZ-TALLARD,
HSBC BANK USA, et al.,
Case No. 2:17-cv-02328-RFB-NJK
(Docket No. 4)
Pending before the Court is a motion to extend the deadline for Defendants to respond to the
complaint. Docket No. 4.1 Defendants represent that Plaintiff’s counsel has agreed to the relief sought.
See id. at 2.
September 26, 2017.
For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED and the deadline is extended to
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: September 13, 2017
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
The motion is incorrectly labeled as seeking “ex parte” relief. An ex parte motion is a one that “is
filed with the court but is not served on the opposing or other parties.” Local Rule IA 7-2(a). As evidenced
by the proof of service, this motion was served on Plaintiff. See Docket No. 4 at 4.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?