Schwartz-Tallard v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association et al

Filing 5

ORDER Granting 4 Motion to Extend Deadline. All Defendants answer due 9/26/17. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/13/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
IRENE MICHELLE SCHWARTZ-TALLARD,
11
Plaintiff(s),
12
v.
13
HSBC BANK USA, et al.,
14
Defendant(s).
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:17-cv-02328-RFB-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 4)

16

Pending before the Court is a motion to extend the deadline for Defendants to respond to the

17

complaint. Docket No. 4.1 Defendants represent that Plaintiff’s counsel has agreed to the relief sought.

18

See id. at 2.

19

September 26, 2017.

For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED and the deadline is extended to

20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21

DATED: September 13, 2017

22

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge

23
24
25
26
1

27
28

The motion is incorrectly labeled as seeking “ex parte” relief. An ex parte motion is a one that “is
filed with the court but is not served on the opposing or other parties.” Local Rule IA 7-2(a). As evidenced
by the proof of service, this motion was served on Plaintiff. See Docket No. 4 at 4.