Schwartz-Tallard v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association et al
Filing
67
ORDER Granting 66 Stipulation to extend time Re: 56 Motion for Summary Judgment. Replies due by 5/7/2019. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 4/23/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Amy F. Sorenson, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12495
Blakeley E. Griffith, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12386
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: 702.784.5200
Facsimile: 702.784.5252
asorenson@swlaw.com
bgriffith@swlaw.com
Attorneys for Defendants HSBC Bank USA,
National Association as Trustee for Nomura
Asset Acceptance Corporation, Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-AF2
and Wells Fargo, N.A.
Snell & Wilmer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nev ada 89169
702.784 .5200
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
13
IRENE MICHELLE SCHWARTZTALLARD, an individual,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
vs.
HSBC BANK USA, National Association,
WELLS FARGO, N.A. its Assignees
and/or Successors, and DOES I through X
inclusive,
18
Defendants.
Case No. 2:17-cv-02328-RFB-NJK
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
EXTENSION FOR DEFENDANTS TO
FILE ITS REPLY TO PLAINTIFF IRENE
MICHELLE SCHWARTZ-TALLARD’S
RESPONSE [ECF NO. 64] TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMARY
JUDGMENT [EFC NO. 56]
(First Request)
19
20
Plaintiff Irene Michelle Schwartz-Tallard (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants HSBC Bank USA,
21
National Association as Trustee for Nomura Asset Acceptance Corporation, Mortgage Pass-
22
Through Certificates, Series 2006-AF2 and Wells Fargo, N.A. (collectively “Defendants”), by
23
and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to allow Defendants to extend the time to
24
file its reply to Plaintiff’s response [ECF No. 64] to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment
25
[ECF No. 56] from April 23, 2019 to May 7, 2019.
26
///
27
28
4813-4754-8820
1
The reason for the extension is not for purposes of delay but rather, is due to the workload
2
of Defendants’ counsel. This is the Parties’ first request for an extension of this deadline.
3
Dated: April 22, 2019.
Dated: April 22, 2019.
4
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL J. HARKER
5
6
7
8
9
10
By:
/s/ Blakeley E. Griffith
By:
/s/ Michael J. Harker
Amy F. Sorenson (NV Bar No. 12495)
Michael J. Harker (NV Bar No. 005353)
Blakeley E. Griffith (NV Bar No. 12386)
2901 El Camino Avenue, Suite 200
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89102
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Telephone: (702) 248-3000
Attorney for Plaintiff
Attorneys for Defendants HSBC Bank USA,
National Association as Trustee for Nomura Asset
Acceptance Corporation, Mortgage PassThrough Certificates, Series 2006-AF2 (“HSBC”)
and Wells Fargo, N.A.
Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nev ada 89169
702.784 .5200
11
12
13
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
________________________________
DATED: ________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
________________________________________
DATED this 23rd day of April, 2019.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4813-4754-8820
-2-
1
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I
hereby
certify
that
on
April
,
2019,
I
electronically
filed
the
3
foregoing STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION FOR DEFENDANTS TO
4
FILE ITS REPLY TO PLAINTIFF IRENE MICHELLE SCHWARTZ-TALLARD’S
5
RESPONSE [ECF NO. 64] TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMARY JUDGMENT
6
[ECF NO. 56] (FIRST REQUEST) with the Clerk of Court for the U.S. District Court,
7
District of Nevada by using the Court’s CM/ECF system. Participants in the case who are
8
registered CM/ECF users will be served by the CM/ECF system.
9
10
DATED this
Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nev ada 89169
702.784 .5200
11
day of April 2019.
/s/Gaylene Kim
An employee of SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4813-4754-8820
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?