Schwartz-Tallard v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association et al

Filing 69

ORDER Granting 68 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: 56 Motion for Summary Judgment. Replies due by 5/14/2019. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 5/8/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Amy F. Sorenson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12495 Blakeley E. Griffith, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12386 SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Telephone: 702.784.5200 Facsimile: 702.784.5252 asorenson@swlaw.com bgriffith@swlaw.com Attorneys for Defendants HSBC Bank USA, National Association as Trustee for Nomura Asset Acceptance Corporation, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-AF2 and Wells Fargo, N.A. Snell & Wilmer IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nev ada 89169 702.784 .5200 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 IRENE MICHELLE SCHWARTZTALLARD, an individual, Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 vs. HSBC BANK USA, National Association, WELLS FARGO, N.A. its Assignees and/or Successors, and DOES I through X inclusive, 18 Defendants. Case No. 2:17-cv-02328-RFB-NJK STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE ITS REPLY TO PLAINTIFF IRENE MICHELLE SCHWARTZ-TALLARD’S RESPONSE [ECF NO. 64] TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [EFC NO. 56] (Second Request) 19 20 Plaintiff Irene Michelle Schwartz-Tallard (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants HSBC Bank USA, 21 National Association as Trustee for Nomura Asset Acceptance Corporation, Mortgage Pass- 22 Through Certificates, Series 2006-AF2 and Wells Fargo, N.A. (collectively “Defendants”), by 23 and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to allow Defendants to extend the time to 24 file its reply to Plaintiff’s response [ECF No. 64] to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment 25 [ECF No. 56] from May 7, 2019 to May 14, 2019. 26 /// 27 28 4816-6557-0710 1 The reason for the extension is not for purposes of delay but rather, is due to the workload 2 of Defendants’ counsel. This is the Parties’ second request for an extension of this deadline. 3 Dated: May 6, 2019. Dated: May 6, 2019. 4 SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL J. HARKER 5 6 7 8 9 10 By: /s/ Blakeley E. Griffith By: /s/ Michael J. Harker Amy F. Sorenson (NV Bar No. 12495) Michael J. Harker (NV Bar No. 005353) Blakeley E. Griffith (NV Bar No. 12386) 2901 El Camino Avenue, Suite 200 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89102 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: (702) 248-3000 Attorney for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendants HSBC Bank USA, National Association as Trustee for Nomura Asset Acceptance Corporation, Mortgage PassThrough Certificates, Series 2006-AF2 (“HSBC”) and Wells Fargo, N.A. Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nev ada 89169 702.784 .5200 11 12 13 ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 ________________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II DATED: ________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 DATED________________________________________ this 8th day of May, 2019. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4816-6557-0710 -2- 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I hereby certify that on May 7, 2019, I electronically filed the foregoing STIPULATION 3 AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE ITS REPLY TO 4 PLAINTIFF IRENE MICHELLE SCHWARTZ-TALLARD’S RESPONSE [ECF NO. 64] 5 TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 56] (SECOND 6 REQUEST) with the Clerk of Court for the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada by using the 7 Court’s CM/ECF system. Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be 8 served by the CM/ECF system. 9 10 DATED this 7th day of May 2019. Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nev ada 89169 702.784 .5200 11 /s/Gaylene Kim An employee of SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4816-6557-0710 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?