The Bank of New York Mellon v. Sunrise Bay Owners' Association et al

Filing 67

ORDER granting 64 Motion to Extend Time; Re: 63 Motion. Responses due 11/12/2019 nun pro tunc. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 12/26/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Case 2:17-cv-02352-JAD-CWH Document 64 Filed 11/08/19 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
R. Samuel Ehlers, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9313
Aaron D. Lancaster, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10115
7785 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89117
[phone]; Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff, The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York, as trustee for
the Certificate Holders of CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust, 20006-OC8, Mortgage PassThrough Certificates, Series 2006-OC8

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9
10
11
12
13
14

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FKA
THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE
FOR THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OF
CWALT, INC., ALTERNATIVE LOAN
TRUST, 2006-OC8, MORTGAGE
PASSTHROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES
2006-OC8, a national bank,

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Case No.: 2:17-cv-02352-JAD-CWH
ORDER GRANTING
JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO LV REAL ESTATE
STRATEGIC INVESTMENT GROUP,
LLC, SERIES 2110’S MOTION TO STAY
FORECLOSURE PENDING APPEAL
AND FIX BOND

Plaintiff,
vs.

ECF No. 64

SUNRISE BAY OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, a
Nevada corporation; LV REAL ESTATE
STRATEGIC INVESTMENT GROUP LLC
SERIES 2110, a Nevada limited liability
company, MICHAEL CLAUSELL, JR., an
individual, KEREKIA CLAUSELL, and
individual,
Defendants.

24

Plaintiff, Plaintiff, The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York, as trustee

25

for the Certificate Holders of CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust, 20006-OC8, Mortgage

26

Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-OC8 (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant, LV Real Estate

27

Strategic Investment Group LLC Series 2110 (“Defendant”) (collectively the “Parties”), by and

28

through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:17-cv-02352-JAD-CWH Document 64 Filed 11/08/19 Page 2 of 2

1

On July 1, 2019, Judgment was entered in favor of Plaintiff [ECF No. 54]. Defendant

2

filed its Notice of Appeal on July 31, 2019 [ECF No. 57]. Defendant filed and served its Motion

3

to Stay Foreclosure Pending Appeal and Fix Bond on October 21, 2019 [ECF No. 63] (the

4

“Motion”). Based on the service date of the Motion, the deadline to file written opposition to the

5

Motion was originally November 4, 2019, under LR 7-2(b). The Parties have discussed

6

extending the deadline for Plaintiff to respond to the Motion.

7
8

WHEREAS, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to
file its Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to November 12, 2019.

9

This is the first stipulation for extension of time for Plaintiff to file its Opposition to

10

Defendant’s Motion. The parties request this extension in order to continue discussing possible

11

resolution. The extension is requested in good faith and is not for purposes of delay or prejudice

12

to any other party.

13
14

DATED this 8th day of November, 2019.
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP

THE LAW OFFICE OF MIKE BEEDE,
PLLC

/s/ Aaron D. Lancaster
R. Samuel Ehlers, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9313
Aaron D. Lancaster, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10115
7785 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89117
Attorneys for Plaintiff, The Bank of New York
Mellon fka The Bank of New York, as trustee
for the Certificate Holders of CWALT, Inc.,
Alternative Loan Trust, 20006-OC8,
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
2006-OC8

/s/ Michael Beede
Michael Beede, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13068
James W. Fox, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13122
2470 St. Rose Pkwy., Ste. 307
Henderson, NV 89074
Attorney for Defendant LV Real Estate
Strategic Investment Group LLC, Series
2110

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED:

24
25
26
27
28

ORDER
___________________________________
Based on the parties' joint motion [ECF No. 64]UNITED STATES appearing, IT IS
and good cause MAGISTRATE JUDGE
HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for plaintiff to respond to the motion to stay is
extended to November 12, 2019, nunc pro tunc, making_________________________
DATED: the response filed that day
[ECF No. 65] timely.
_____________________________
U.S. District Court Judge 12-26-19
Page 2 of 2