Delapinia v. Williams Sr et al

Filing 20

ORDER that Petitioner's motion to stay case and hold in abeyance (ECF No. 18 ) is granted; this action is stayed pending exhaustion of the unexhausted claims; Petitioner must return to this Court with a motion to reopen within 45 days o f issuance of the remittitur by the Nevada Supreme Court at the conclusion of the state court proceedings; Petitioner or Respondents otherwise may move to reopen the action and seek any relief appropriate under the circumstances; Clerk directed to administratively close this action until such time as the court grants a motion to reopen the action. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/23/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 RYAN L. DELAPINIA, Case No. 2:17-cv-02376-MMD-CWH Petitioner, 10 ORDER v. 11 BRIAN WILLIAMS, SR., et al., 12 Respondents. 13 14 15 16 17 Petitioner has filed a motion to stay case and hold in abeyance. (ECF No. 18.) Respondents do not oppose the motion. (ECF No. 19.) It is therefore ordered that Petitioner’s motion to stay case and hold in abeyance (ECF No. 18) is granted. 18 It is further ordered that this action is stayed pending exhaustion of the unexhausted 19 claims. Petitioner must return to this Court with a motion to reopen within forty-five (45) 20 days of issuance of the remittitur by the Nevada Supreme Court at the conclusion of the 21 state court proceedings. Further, Petitioner or Respondents otherwise may move to 22 reopen the action and seek any relief appropriate under the circumstances. 23 24 25 It is further ordered that the Clerk of Court administratively close this action until such time as the court grants a motion to reopen the action. DATED THIS 23rd day of July 2018. 26 27 28 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?