Blandino v. Bare et al

Filing 12

ORDER that the Clerk of Court shall strike Petitioner's 11 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus from the record. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/29/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 KIM BLANDINO, 4 Case No.: 2:17-cv-02379-APG-GWF Petitioner, ORDER v. 5 [ECF No. 11] 6 JUDGE ROB BARE, et al., 7 8 Respondents. Petitioner Kim Blandino has filed a pleading styled as an “Amended Petition for Writ of 9 Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 By a Person in State Custody.” ECF No.11. On 10 October 12, 2017, I entered an order dismissing Blandino’s habeas petition for lack of 11 jurisdiction. ECF No. 4. The court entered judgment the following day (ECF No. 5) and 12 thereafter denied Blandino’s subsequent Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) motion (ECF No. 13 7). The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied Blandino’s request for a 14 certificate of appealability as to those decisions. ECF No. 10. Consequently, Blandino’s 15 “amended petition” is an unauthorized pleading and shall be stricken from the record. See LR IA 16 10-1(d) (“The court may strike any document that does not conform to an applicable provision of 17 these rules or any Federal Rule of Civil or Criminal Procedure.”). 18 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall strike petitioner Kim 19 Blandino’s “amended petition” (ECF No. 11) from the record. 20 Dated: October 29, 2018. 21 22 23 ___________________________ ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?