Thuna v. Kohn et al
Filing
14
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 13 the "objection," liberally construed as a motion for reconsideration, is GRANTED. Thuna has until 12/29/2017, to file a renewed motion for reconsideration that includes the arguments raised in his original, never-received objection. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 12/4/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
Barren Mar Thuna,
5
Plaintiff
6
v.
7
2:17-cv-02395-JAD-VCF
Order Re: Objection
Philip J. Kohn, et al.,
8
[ECF No. 13]
Defendants
9
10
Pro se plaintiff Barren Mar Thuna sued the Clark County Public Defender, multiple
11
deputy public defenders, and a justice court judge for allegedly violating his First, Fifth, Sixth,
12
and Eighth Amendment rights.1 On October 23, 2017, Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach
13
screened Thuna’s complaint, and he recommended that the court dismiss counts 1–3 against the
14
justice court judge only and count 4 against all defendants.2 The court received no objections,
15
and on November 15, 2017, adopted that recommendation and dismissed those claims.3
16
Thuna has filed an “objection” to that dismissal order, explaining that he did file an
17
objection but it must have been a casualty of “questionable” mail delivery at his detention
18
facility.4 He asks for the opportunity to file objections.
19
I construe his “objection” [ECF No. 13] as a motion for reconsideration, and—good cause
20
appearing—I grant that motion. Thuna has until December 29, 2017, to file a renewed motion
21
for reconsideration that includes all the points and authorities that he offered in his never-
22
received objection. The court will then reconsider the magistrate judge’s report and
23
24
1
ECF No. 1-1.
2
ECF No. 7.
3
ECF No. 12.
4
ECF No. 13.
25
26
27
28
1
2
recommendation de novo in light of Thuna’s arguments.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the “objection,” liberally construed as a
3
motion for reconsideration, [ECF No. 13] is GRANTED. Thuna has until December 29, 2017,
4
to file a renewed motion for reconsideration that includes the arguments raised in his original,
5
never-received objection.
6
DATED: December 4, 2017.
7
_______________________________
_______________
_ _
_ __
___
U.S. District Judge Jennifer A Dorsey
rict Judge Jennifer A.
c d
nn fe
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?