Klatt v. Dignity Health

Filing 10

ORDER Granting 9 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 4 Motion to Dismiss (Second Request). Responses due by 10/25/2017. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 10/24/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Lawrence J. Semenza, III, Esq., Bar No. 7174 Email: ljs@skrlawyers.com Christopher D. Kircher, Esq., Bar No. 11176 Email: cdk@skrlawyers.com Jarrod L. Rickard, Esq., Bar No. 10203 Email jlr@skrlawyers.com SEMENZA KIRCHER RICKARD 10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Telephone: (702) 835-6803 Facsimile: (702) 920-8669 Attorneys for Plaintiff Megan E. Klatt and all others similarly situated 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA SEMENZA KIRCHER RICKARD 10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Telephone: (702) 835-6803 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 MEGAN E. KLATT, an individual, on behalf Case No. 2:17-cv-02425-RFB-PAL of herself and all others similarly situated; STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS v. PARTS OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT DIGNITY HEALTH, a California (Second Request) corporation; DOES 1-50, unknown individuals; and ROE COMPANIES 1-50, unknown business entities, Defendants. 19 20 21 Plaintiff Megan E. Klatt ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Dignity Health ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby submit this second stipulation to extend the 22 time for Plaintiff to file its Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Parts of Plaintiff's 23 Complaint (the "Motion") (Dkt. 4). 24 BACKGROUND 25 26 A. On September 25, 2017, Defendant filed the Motion. 27 28 1 B. 1 On October 5, 2017, the Court granted the Parties' stipulated Order continuing the 2 deadline for Plaintiff's Opposition to the Motion from October 9, 2017, to October 23, 2017, and 3 continuing the deadline for Defendant's Reply in Support of the Motion to November 13, 207. C. 4 While Plaintiff had anticipated being able to file the Opposition by October 23, 5 2017, conflicts have arisen that necessitate this additional extension. In particular, Plaintiff 6 requires additional time to prepare the Opposition as Plaintiff's counsel is still working toward 7 upcoming briefing deadlines in two separate appeals pending before the Nevada Supreme Court. 8 In light of this, Defendant has agreed to Plaintiff's request for an additional two-day continuation 9 of the deadline for the Opposition. 10 D. SEMENZA KIRCHER RICKARD 10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Telephone: (702) 835-6803 11 A hearing on the Motion has not yet been set. STIPULATION 12 NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 13 1. 14 15 16 17 18 19 The deadline for Plaintiff's Opposition to the Motion shall be continued to October 25, 2017; and /// /// /// /// /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// /// /// /// /// /// 2 1 2 3 2. The deadline for Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition shall remain as November 13, 2017. DATED this 23rd day of October 2017. 4 SEMENZA KIRCHER RICKARD 5 /s/ Jarrod L. Rickard Lawrence J. Semenza, III, Esq., Bar No. 7174 Christopher D. Kircher, Esq., Bar No. 11176 Jarrod L. Rickard, Esq., Bar No. 10203 10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 6 7 8 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff Megan E. Klatt and all others similarly situated 10 SEMENZA KIRCHER RICKARD 10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Telephone: (702) 835-6803 11 12 JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 13 /s/ Elayna J. Youchah Elayna J. Youchah, Esq., Bar No. 5837 Kirsten A. Milton, Esq., Bar No. 14401 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 14 15 16 Attorneys for Defendant Dignity Health 17 18 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. __________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 24th DATED this _______ day of October 2017. 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?