Klatt v. Dignity Health
Filing
10
ORDER Granting 9 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 4 Motion to Dismiss (Second Request). Responses due by 10/25/2017. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 10/24/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Lawrence J. Semenza, III, Esq., Bar No. 7174
Email: ljs@skrlawyers.com
Christopher D. Kircher, Esq., Bar No. 11176
Email: cdk@skrlawyers.com
Jarrod L. Rickard, Esq., Bar No. 10203
Email jlr@skrlawyers.com
SEMENZA KIRCHER RICKARD
10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Telephone: (702) 835-6803
Facsimile: (702) 920-8669
Attorneys for Plaintiff Megan E. Klatt
and all others similarly situated
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
SEMENZA KIRCHER RICKARD
10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Telephone: (702) 835-6803
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
MEGAN E. KLATT, an individual, on behalf Case No. 2:17-cv-02425-RFB-PAL
of herself and all others similarly situated;
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR
Plaintiff,
PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS
v.
PARTS OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
DIGNITY
HEALTH,
a
California
(Second Request)
corporation;
DOES
1-50,
unknown
individuals; and ROE COMPANIES 1-50,
unknown business entities,
Defendants.
19
20
21
Plaintiff Megan E. Klatt ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Dignity Health ("Defendant"), by and
through their respective counsel of record, hereby submit this second stipulation to extend the
22
time for Plaintiff to file its Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Parts of Plaintiff's
23
Complaint (the "Motion") (Dkt. 4).
24
BACKGROUND
25
26
A.
On September 25, 2017, Defendant filed the Motion.
27
28
1
B.
1
On October 5, 2017, the Court granted the Parties' stipulated Order continuing the
2
deadline for Plaintiff's Opposition to the Motion from October 9, 2017, to October 23, 2017, and
3
continuing the deadline for Defendant's Reply in Support of the Motion to November 13, 207.
C.
4
While Plaintiff had anticipated being able to file the Opposition by October 23,
5
2017, conflicts have arisen that necessitate this additional extension. In particular, Plaintiff
6
requires additional time to prepare the Opposition as Plaintiff's counsel is still working toward
7
upcoming briefing deadlines in two separate appeals pending before the Nevada Supreme Court.
8
In light of this, Defendant has agreed to Plaintiff's request for an additional two-day continuation
9
of the deadline for the Opposition.
10
D.
SEMENZA KIRCHER RICKARD
10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Telephone: (702) 835-6803
11
A hearing on the Motion has not yet been set.
STIPULATION
12
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
13
1.
14
15
16
17
18
19
The deadline for Plaintiff's Opposition to the Motion shall be continued to October
25, 2017; and
///
///
///
///
///
20
///
21
///
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
///
///
///
///
///
///
2
1
2
3
2.
The deadline for Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition shall remain as
November 13, 2017.
DATED this 23rd day of October 2017.
4
SEMENZA KIRCHER RICKARD
5
/s/ Jarrod L. Rickard
Lawrence J. Semenza, III, Esq., Bar No. 7174
Christopher D. Kircher, Esq., Bar No. 11176
Jarrod L. Rickard, Esq., Bar No. 10203
10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
6
7
8
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff Megan E. Klatt
and all others similarly situated
10
SEMENZA KIRCHER RICKARD
10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Telephone: (702) 835-6803
11
12
JACKSON LEWIS P.C.
13
/s/ Elayna J. Youchah
Elayna J. Youchah, Esq., Bar No. 5837
Kirsten A. Milton, Esq., Bar No. 14401
3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
14
15
16
Attorneys for Defendant Dignity Health
17
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
__________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
21
22
24th
DATED this _______ day of October 2017.
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?