Gayler v. High Desert State Prison et al

Filing 66

ORDER Granting 65 Stipulation to Continue Mandatory Settlement Conference. Settlement Conference set for 9/20/2022 at 09:00 AM in LV Chambers - Video conference before Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. See order for Further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 6/1/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LOE)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-02429-JAD-EJY Document 66 Filed 06/01/22 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 ANDRÉA L. VIEIRA, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 15667 THE VIEIRA FIRM, PLLC 3100 W. Charleston Blvd., Ste. 200 Las Vegas, NV 89102 Telephone: (702) 793-3160 Facsimile: (702) 637-4722 Email: Andrea@TheVieiraFirm.com Court Appointed Pro Bono Attorney for Plaintiff 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 BRANDYN GAYLER, CASE NO.: 11 12 vs. 13 HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON, et al. 14 2:17-cv-02429-JAD-EJY Plaintiff, Defendant. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE (Fourth Request) WHEREAS, on March 31, 2022, Andréa L. Vieira, Esq. was appointed as pro bono counsel for Plaintiff, BRANDYN GAYLER (ECF No. 54). WHEREAS, on May 25, 2022, the Court granted in part and denied in part (ECF No. 64) Plaintiff’s Motion to Reopen Discovery (ECF No. 55). WHEREAS the Court ordered that limited discovery in this matter will be allowed for a period of 90 days, and the close of discovery is now set of August 23, 2022 (ECF No. 64). 24 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff BRANDYN 25 GAYLER (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) by and through his counsel of record, Andréa L. Vieira, Esq. 26 of The Vieira Firm, and Defendants ALEXIS LOZANO, PERRY RUSSELL, and DAVID 27 TRISTAN (hereinafter collectively “Defendants”), by and through their counsel of record, Aaron 28 D. Ford, Esq., Attorney General for the State of Nevada, and Austin T. Barnum, Esq., Deputy 1 Case 2:17-cv-02429-JAD-EJY Document 66 Filed 06/01/22 Page 2 of 2 1 Attorney General, pursuant to LR 7-1, LR IA 6-1 and LR IA 6-2, that the Mandatory Settlement 2 Conference currently set for July 19, 2022 (ECF No. 62), along with the associated deadline for 3 the parties to submit the confidential settlement conference statement with exhibits, be continued 4 to another date and time after August 23, 2022, to allow time for the parties to participate in the 5 limited discovery ordered by the Court. 6 1st day of June, 2022. DATED this _____ 1st day of June, 2022. DATED this _____ THE VIEIRA FIRM, PLLC STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL By: By: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 /s/ Andréa L. Vieira ANDRÉA L. VIEIRA, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 15667 3100 W. Charleston Blvd., Ste. 200 Las Vegas, NV 89102 Telephone: (702) 793-3160 Email: Andrea@TheVieiraFirm.com Court Appointed Pro Bono Attorney for Plaintiff 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 /s/ Austin T. Barnum AARON D. FORD, ESQ. Attorney General AUSTIN T. BARNUM, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 15174 Deputy Attorney General 555 East Washington Ave., #3900 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 486-0661 E-mail: abarnum@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Defendants Alexis Lozano, Perry Russell, and David Tristan IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation and Order to Continue Mandatory Settlement Conference (ECF No. 65) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the zoom settlement conference currently set for July 19, 2022 is vacated and rescheduled to September 20, 2022 at 9:00 a.m. The parties shall contact Elvia Garcia, Courtroom Deputy for the undersigned Magistrate Judge, by 12:00 p.m. on September 16, 2022 at Elvia_Garcia@nvd.uscourts.gov, and provide the email addresses of their respective participants. The Courtroom Deputy shall email all participants the zoom link. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the confidential settlement conference statements, with exhibits, shall be delivered electronically to Emily_Santiago@nvd.uscourts.gov by 3:00 p.m. on September 13, 2022. 27 28 ______________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED: June 1, 2022 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?