Layne v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
Filing
16
ORDER that Plaintiff shall file her certificate of interested parties which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than 12/12/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/28/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
GAYLE LAYNE,
8
9
10
11
v.
Case No. 2:17-cv-02434-JAD-PAL
Plaintiff,
ORDER
C.R. BARD, INC., et al.,
Defendant.
12
This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s failure to file a Certificate as to Interested
13
Parties as required by LR 7.1-1. The complaint in this matter was filed in state court and removed
14
(ECF No. 1) September 18, 2017. Defendants filed an Answer (ECF No. 5) September 25, 2017.
15
LR 7.1-1(a) requires, unless otherwise ordered, that in all cases (except habeas corpus cases)
16
counsel for private parties shall, upon entering a case, identify in the disclosure statement required
17
by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships or corporations
18
(including parent corporations) which have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case.
19
LR 7.1-1(b) further states that if there are no known interested parties other than those participating
20
in the case, a statement to that effect must be filed. Additionally, LR 7.1-1(c) requires a party to
21
promptly file a supplemental certification upon any change in the information that this rule
22
requires. To date, plaintiff has failed to comply. Accordingly,
23
IT IS ORDERED plaintiff shall file her certificate of interested parties, which fully
24
complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than December 12, 2017. Failure to comply may result in the
25
issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed.
26
DATED this 28th day of November, 2017.
27
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?