Layne v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al

Filing 16

ORDER that Plaintiff shall file her certificate of interested parties which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than 12/12/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/28/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
    1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 GAYLE LAYNE, 8 9 10 11 v. Case No. 2:17-cv-02434-JAD-PAL Plaintiff, ORDER C.R. BARD, INC., et al., Defendant. 12 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s failure to file a Certificate as to Interested 13 Parties as required by LR 7.1-1. The complaint in this matter was filed in state court and removed 14 (ECF No. 1) September 18, 2017. Defendants filed an Answer (ECF No. 5) September 25, 2017. 15 LR 7.1-1(a) requires, unless otherwise ordered, that in all cases (except habeas corpus cases) 16 counsel for private parties shall, upon entering a case, identify in the disclosure statement required 17 by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships or corporations 18 (including parent corporations) which have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case. 19 LR 7.1-1(b) further states that if there are no known interested parties other than those participating 20 in the case, a statement to that effect must be filed. Additionally, LR 7.1-1(c) requires a party to 21 promptly file a supplemental certification upon any change in the information that this rule 22 requires. To date, plaintiff has failed to comply. Accordingly, 23 IT IS ORDERED plaintiff shall file her certificate of interested parties, which fully 24 complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than December 12, 2017. Failure to comply may result in the 25 issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. 26 DATED this 28th day of November, 2017. 27 PEGGY A. LEEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?