Gould et al v. Rogers et al

Filing 15

ORDER Granting 14 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 10 Motion to Remand to State Court and 1 Petition for Removal. Responses due by 11/16/2017. William Rogers answer due 11/16/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/8/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-02435-APG-NJK Document 14 Filed 11/07/17 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Karl O. Riley, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12077 SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: (702) 784-5200 Facsimile: (702) 784-5252 Email: kriley@swlaw.com Attorney for Defendant Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. and William Rogers 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 702.784.520 0 Snell & Wilmer 12 13 14 15 16 DAN GOULD, an individual, and AUDREE GOULD, an individual, Plaintiffs, vs. WILLIAM ROGERS, an individual, HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS USA, INC., a California Corporation, DOES I through X, inclusive, and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive, Case No. 2:17-cv-02435-APG-NJK STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT AND MOTION FOR REMAND [SECOND REQUEST] Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiffs Dan and Audree Gould, and Defendants William Rogers (“Rogers”) and Harbor 19 Freight Tools USA, Inc. (“Harbor Freight,” together with Rogers, “Defendants”), through their 20 respective counsel, stipulate for the second time to continue Defendant Rogers’ response to 21 Plaintiffs’ Complaint and Defendants’ response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Remand, ECF No. 10, as 22 follows: WHEREAS, Plaintiffs served Defendant Rogers with the Summons and Complaint on 23 24 October 6, 2017; WHEREAS, Defendant Rogers’ response to Plaintiffs’ Complaint is due November 10, 25 26 2017; WHEREAS, Defendants’ response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Remand is due November 13, 27 28 2017; 4823-2054-9201.1 Case 2:17-cv-02435-APG-NJK Document 14 Filed 11/07/17 Page 2 of 3 1 WHEREAS, this request is timely; 2 WHEREAS, the Parties agreed to provide Defendants’ additional time to respond to 3 Plaintiffs’ Complaint and Motion for Remand to permit Defendants to file a stipulation to 4 substitute Clyde & Co US LLP as counsel of record and to provide the Court sufficient time to 5 issue an order on the same; 6 7 WHEREAS, this request is not made for purposes of delay and is supported by good cause; 8 9 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for good cause, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties as follows: 10 11 1. November 16, 2017. L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 702.784.5200 Snell & Wilmer 12 13 Defendant Rogers will respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint on or before 2. Defendants will respond to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Remand on or before November 16, 2017. 14 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 15 DATED: November 6, 2017. JENNINGS & FULTON, LTD. 16 18 19 20 21 Attorney for Defendants William Rogers and Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 22 23 25 By:/s/ Karl O. Riley Karl O. Riley, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12077 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 By: /s/ Adam R. Fulton JARED B. JENNINGS, ESQ. ADAM R. FULTON, ESQ. TOD R. DUBOW, ESQ. 2580 Sorrel Street Las Vegas, NV 89146 Telephone: (702) 979-3565 Facsimile: (702) 362-2060 17 24 DATED: November 6, 2017. SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Rogers shall respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint on or before November 16, November 16, 2017.2017. // // 26 IT IS ORDERED that Defendants shall respond to Plaintiffs' Motion for Remand on or before November 16, before November 16, 2017.2017. 27 // 28 // // __________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: November 8, 2017. -2- 3 4823-2054-9201.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?