Christiana Trust v. Hampton & Hampton Collections, LLC et al
ORDER. The Court is satisfied that dismissal is not appropriate at this time, but CAUTIONS Plaintiff that it must diligently prosecute this case. The order to show cause is otherwise DISCHARGED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/11/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
HOLLYWOOD RANCH HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION, et al.,
Case No. 2:17-cv-02441-JCM-NJK
Pending before the Court is an order for Plaintiff to show cause why its claims against the non-
appearing Defendants should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Docket No. 29. Plaintiff filed
a response. Docket No. 32. Plaintiff also filed notices of intent to take default. Docket Nos. 30-31.
The Court is satisfied that dismissal is not appropriate at this time, but CAUTIONS Plaintiff that it must
diligently prosecute this case.1 The order to show cause is otherwise DISCHARGED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: April 11, 2018
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
In its response to the order to show cause, Plaintiff relies in part on the fact that it has sought a stay
of this case. See Docket No. 32 at 3-4. The filing of a motion to stay has no legal effect on whether a case
must proceed; a case is only stayed if the Court issues an order so directing. See, e.g., Willemijn
Houdstermaatschappij BV v. Apollo Computer Inc., 707 F. Supp. 1429, 1441 (D. Del. 1989).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?