Elfberg v. Downtown Project, LLC et al

Filing 10

ORDER Granting 7 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 1 Complaint (First Request). Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/31/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 SANDRA KETNER, ESQ., Bar # 8527 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 200 S. Virginia Street 8th Floor Reno, NV 89501 Telephone: 775.348.4888 Fax No.: 775.786.0127 Attorneys for Defendant DOWNTOWN PROJECT, LLC and GOLD SPIKE 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 SAVANNAH ELFBERG, Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. 14 DOWNTOWN PROJECT, LLC, a Limited Liability Company; GOLD SPIKE, a Nevada business entity, 15 Case No. 2:17-cv-02450-JAD-PAL STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING [FIRST REQUEST] Defendants. 16 17 18 Pursuant to LR IA 6-1 and LR 7-1, Plaintiff SAVANNAH ELFBERG (“Plaintiff”) and 19 Defendants DOWNTOWN PROJECT, LLC and GOLD SPIKE (“Defendants”), by and through 20 their respective counsel, do hereby stipulate and agree to an extension of thirty (30) days, 21 up to and including Wednesday, November 29, 2017, for Defendants to file their first 22 responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C . Attorneys At Law 200 S. Virginia St reet 8th Floor Reno, NV 89501 775.348.4888 1 This Stipulation is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay as defense 2 counsel has recently been retained and needs sufficient time to investigate the allegations 3 of the Complaint. Additionally, counsel for the parties are discussing the identity of the 4 proper defendant in this matter which employed Plaintiff. 5 amended complaint will likely be forthcoming in order to narrow the causes of action and 6 identify the proper parties so that the filing of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion is avoided. 7 Additionally, the parties are discussing the potential for early resolution of this matter. 8 Dated: October 26, 2017 The parties believe that an Dated: October 26, 2017 9 10 11 12 13 TREVOR J. HATFIELD, ESQ. HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES, LTD. /s/Trevor J. Hatfield /s/Sandra Ketner SANDRA KETNER, ESQ. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff SAVANNAH ELFBERG Attorneys for Defendant DOWNTOWN PROJECT, LLC and GOLD SPIKE 14 15 16 17 ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 20 21 U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated this 31st day of October, 2017. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C . Attorneys At Law 200 S. Virginia St reet 8th Floor Reno, NV 89501 775.348.4888 2. PROOF OF SERVICE 1 2 3 I am a resident of the State of Nevada, over the age of eighteen years, and 4 not a party to the within action. My business address is 200 S. Virginia Street, 8th Floor, 5 Reno, Nevada 89501. On October 26, 2017, I served the within document(s): 6 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING 7 8 9 10 11 12 13  By CM/ECF Filing – Pursuant to FRCP 5(b)(3) and LR 5-4, the abovereferenced document was electronically filed and served upon the parties listed below through the Court’s Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system: Trevor J. Hatfield, Esq. HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES, LTD. 703 South Eighth Street Las Vegas, NV 89101 thatfield@hatfieldlawassociates.com 14 I am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing 15 correspondence for mailing and for shipping via overnight delivery service. Under that 16 practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service or if an overnight delivery 17 service shipment, deposited in an overnight delivery service pick-up box or office on the 18 same day with postage or fees thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business. 19 20 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on October 26, 2017, at Reno, Nevada. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C . Attorneys At Law 200 S. Virginia St reet 8th Floor Reno, NV 89501 775.348.4888 Firmwide:150792056.1 092307.1000 /s/Esperansa Reinold ESPERANSA REINOLD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?