Xcelis LLC v. Panasonic Corporation of North America

Filing 14

ORDER Granting 13 Motion to Extend Time. Panasonic Corporation of North America answer due 12/8/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 10/24/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Case 2:17-cv-02463-RFB-CWH Document 13 Filed 10/23/17 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

James J. Pisanelli, Esq., Bar No. 4027
[e-mail]
M. Magali Mercera, Esq., Bar No. 11742
[e-mail]

PISANELLI BICE PLLC

400 South 7th Street, Suite 300
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 702.214.2101
Steven G. Hill, Esq. (pro hac vice admitted)
Vivek Ganti, Esq. (pro hac vice admitted)
Martha L. Decker, Esq. (pro hac vice admitted)

HILL, KERTSCHER & WHARTON

3350 Riverwood Parkway, Suite 800
Atlanta, Georgia 30339
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 770.953.1358
Attorneys for Plaintiff Xcelis LLC

PISANELLI BICE PLLC
400 SOUTH 7TH STREET, SUITE 300
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89101

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

13
14
15
16
17

XCELIS LLC, a Nevada limited liability
company,

Case No.: 2:17-cv-02463-RFB-CWH

Plaintiff,

PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO
EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO FILE
ANSWER; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
THEREON

v.
PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH
AMERICA, a Delaware corporation,
Defendant.

18
19
20
21

Plaintiff Xcelis LLC ("Xcelis") moves to extend by forty-five (45) days the time for

22

Defendant Panasonic Corporation ("Panasonic") to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's

23

Complaint. In support, Xcelis states as follows: Panasonic's response to the Complaint is due

24

October 24, 2017. Xcelis' counsel and in-house counsel for Panasonic have conferred and agreed

25

to a forty-five (45) day extension to answer to the Complaint. Panasonic needs this time to hire

26

outside counsel and investigate and respond to the allegations of the Complaint. A 45-day

27

extension would make Panasonic's response due by December 8, 2017.

28

1

Case 2:17-cv-02463-RFB-CWH Document 13 Filed 10/23/17 Page 2 of 3

For these reasons, the Parties respectfully request an additional 45 days for Panasonic to

1
2

answer the Complaint.
DATED this 23rd day of October 2017.

3

PISANELLI BICE PLLC

4
5

By:

6
7
8

and

9

HILL, KERTSCHER & WHARTON LLP
Steven G. Hill, Esq. (pro hac vice admitted)
Vivek Ganti, Esq. (pro hac vice admitted)
Martha L. Decker, Esq. (pro hac vice admitted)
3350 Riverwood Parkway, Suite 800
Atlanta, GA 30339

10
11
PISANELLI BICE PLLC
400 SOUTH 7TH STREET, SUITE 300
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89101

/s/ M. Magali Mercera
James J. Pisanelli, Esq., Bar No. 4027
M. Magali Mercera, Esq., Bar No. 11742
400 South 7th Street, Suite 300
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101

12
13
14

Attorneys for Plaintiff

15
16
ORDER

17
IT IS SO ORDERED.

18
19

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20
21

October 24, 2017
DATED: ________________________

22

CASE NO: 17-cv-02463-RFB-CWH

23
24
25
26
27
28

2

Case 2:17-cv-02463-RFB-CWH Document 13 Filed 10/23/17 Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

1
2

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am an employee of PISANELLI BICE PLLC and that, on this

3

23rd day of October 2017, I caused to be served via the Court's CM/ECF service system a true

4

and correct copy of the above PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND

5

DEFENDANT'S TIME TO FILE ANSWER; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON to

6

all persons on the CM/ECF service list.
/s/ Cinda Towne
An employee of PISANELLI BICE PLLC

7
8
9
10

PISANELLI BICE PLLC
400 SOUTH 7TH STREET, SUITE 300
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89101

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3