Xcelis LLC v. Panasonic Corporation of North America

Filing 16

ORDER Granting 15 Motion to Extend Time. Panasonic Corporation of North America answer due 1/8/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 12/7/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Case 2:17-cv-02463-RFB-CWH Document 15 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

James J. Pisanelli, Esq., Bar No. 4027
[e-mail]
M. Magali Mercera, Esq., Bar No. 11742
[e-mail]

PISANELLI BICE PLLC

400 South 7th Street, Suite 300
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 702.214.2101
Steven G. Hill, Esq. (pro hac vice admitted)
Vivek Ganti, Esq. (pro hac vice admitted)
Martha L. Decker, Esq. (pro hac vice admitted)

HILL, KERTSCHER & WHARTON

3350 Riverwood Parkway, Suite 800
Atlanta, Georgia 30339
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 770.953.1358
Attorneys for Plaintiff Xcelis LLC

PISANELLI BICE PLLC
400 SOUTH 7TH STREET, SUITE 300
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89101

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

13
14
15
16
17

XCELIS LLC, a Nevada limited liability
company,

Case No.: 17-cv-02463-RFB-CWH

Plaintiff,

PLAINTIFF'S SECOND UNOPPOSED
MOTION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S
TIME TO FILE ANSWER; AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

v.
PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH
AMERICA, a Delaware corporation,
Defendant.

18
19
20
21

Plaintiff Xcelis LLC ("Xcelis" or "Plaintiff") moves to extend by thirty (30) days the time

22

for Defendant Panasonic Corporation ("Panasonic") to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's

23

Complaint. In support, Xcelis states as follows: Panasonic's response to the Complaint is due

24

December 8, 2017. (ECF No. 14.) Xcelis and Panasonic are in the process of memorializing a

25

settlement in principle to resolve the claims at issue in the Complaint. Xcelis' counsel and in-

26

house counsel for Panasonic have conferred and agreed that a 30-day extension will provide the

27

Parties time to memorialize the anticipated settlement.

28

Panasonic's response due by January 8, 2018.

1

A 30-day extension would make

Case 2:17-cv-02463-RFB-CWH Document 15 Filed 12/06/17 Page 2 of 3

For these reasons, the Parties respectfully request an additional 30 days for Panasonic to

1
2

answer the Complaint.
DATED this 6th day of December 2017.

3

PISANELLI BICE PLLC

4
5

By: /s/ M. Magali Mercera
James J. Pisanelli, Esq., Bar No. 4027
M. Magali Mercera, Esq., Bar No. 11742
400 South 7th Street, Suite 300
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101

6
7
8

and

9

HILL, KERTSCHER & WHARTON LLP
Steven G. Hill, Esq. (pro hac vice admitted)
Vivek Ganti, Esq. (pro hac vice admitted)
Martha L. Decker, Esq. (pro hac vice admitted)
3350 Riverwood Parkway, Suite 800
Atlanta, GA 30339

10

PISANELLI BICE PLLC
400 SOUTH 7TH STREET, SUITE 300
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89101

11
12
13
14

Attorneys for Plaintiff

15
16
ORDER

17
IT IS SO ORDERED.

18
19

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20
21

December 7, 2017
DATED: ________________________

22

CASE NO: 17-cv-02463-RFB-CWH

23
24
25
26
27
28

2

Case 2:17-cv-02463-RFB-CWH Document 15 Filed 12/06/17 Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

1
2

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am an employee of PISANELLI BICE PLLC and that, on this

3

6th day of December 2017, I caused to be served via the Court's CM/ECF service system a true

4

and correct copy of the above PLAINTIFF'S SECOND UNOPPOSED MOTION TO

5

EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO FILE ANSWER; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

6

THEREON to all persons on the CM/ECF service list.
/s/ Cinda Towne
An employee of PISANELLI BICE PLLC

7
8
9
10

PISANELLI BICE PLLC
400 SOUTH 7TH STREET, SUITE 300
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89101

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3