Mendoza v. Amalgamated Transit Union International et al

Filing 48

ORDER Granting 45 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 38 Motion to Dismiss (First Request). Replies due by 1/2/2018. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/21/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 CHRISTENSEN JAMES & MARTIN 7440 WEST SAHARA AVE., LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89117 PH: (702) 255-1718 § FAX: (702) 255-0871 9 10 11 CHRISTENSEN JAMES & MARTIN EVAN L. JAMES, ESQ. (7760) KEVIN B. ARCHIBALD, ESQ. (13817) 7440 W. Sahara Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 Telephone: (702) 255-1718 Facsimile: (702) 255-0871 Email: elj@cjmlv.com, kba@cjmlv.com BREDHOFF & KAISER BRUCE R. LERNER, ESQ. (admitted pro hac vice) JACOB KARABELL, ESQ. (admitted pro hac vice) 805 15th Street N.W., Suite 1000 Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 842-2600 Facsimile: (202) 842-1888 Email: blerner@bredhoff.com, jkarabell@bredhoff.com Attorneys for Amalgamated Transit Union International, James Lindsay III, Lawrence J. Hanley, Antonette Bryant, Terry Richards, Carolyn Higgins, Keira Mcnett, Daniel Smith, and Tyler Home 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 15 JOSE MENDOZA JR., individually and as a member and on behalf of the AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION LOCAL 1637, a non-profit corporation, 16 Plaintiff, 17 vs. 18 AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION INTERNATIONAL (“ATU”), a nonprofit corporation; JAMES LINDSAY III, individually and in his official capacity as ATU International Vice President and Trustee; LAWRENCE J. HANLEY, individually and in his official capacity as International Union President; ANTONETTE BRYANT, individually and in her official capacity as International Representative and Hearing Officer; TERRY RICHARDS, individually; CAROLYN HIGGINS, individually; KEIRA MCNETT, individual; DANIEL SMITH, individually; TYLER HOME, individually; DOES; and ROE CORPORATIONS 1-20, inclusive, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants. CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-02485-JCM-CWH STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 1 Defendants Amalgamated Transit Union et al., by and through their counsel of record, 2 Evan L. James, Esq.; and Plaintiff Jose Mendoza, by and through his counsel of record, Michael 3 Mcavoyamaya, Esq., stipulate and agree as follows: 4 5 Whereas a Motion To Dismiss was filed by Defendants on December 5, 2017 (ECF No. 38). Whereas Plaintiff will file an Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss on December 6 7 19, 2017. 8 9 Whereas the deadline for Defendants to file a Reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss is December 26, 2017. Whereas to accommodate pre-planned holiday travel that counsel for Defendants has, the 10 11 parties have agreed to extend the deadline for Defendants to file their Reply in support of their 12 Motion to Dismiss to January 2, 2018. 13 14 15 /// 16 17 /// 18 19 /// 20 21 /// 22 23 /// 24 25 /// 26 27 /// 28 -1- 1 It Is Hereby Stipulated that the deadline for Defendants to file their Reply in support of 2 their Motion to Dismiss be extended from December 26, 2017 to January 2, 2018.1 3 SO STIPULATED SO STIPULATED 4 DATED this 19th day of December, 2017. DATED this 19th day of December, 2017. 5 MICHAEL J. MCAVOYAMAYA, ESQ. By: /s/ Michael J. Mcavoyamaya Michael J. Mcavoyamaya, Esq. Nevada Bar No.: 14082 4539 Paseo Del Ray Las Vegas, NY 89121 Counsel for Plaintiff’ CHRISTENSEN JAMES & MARTIN By: /s/ Evan L. James Nevada Bar No. 7760 7440 W. Sahara Avenue Las Vegas, NV 89117 6 7 8 BREDHOFF & KAISER, P.L.L.C 9 By: /s/ Jacob Karabell admitted pro hac vice 805 15th Street N.W., Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20005 Counsel for Defendants 10 11 12 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED: 15 ____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 December 21, 2017. DATED: _____________________________ 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Should the Court wish to set oral argument on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiffs’ counsel would like to inform the Court that he will be out of the country from January 5 through January 15, 2008. 1 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?