Smith v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

Filing 7

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 5 the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation entered 11/13/17, are ADOPTED and AFFIRMED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter JUDGMENT for Defendant and against Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 12/4/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9
10

MARTY SMITH,

11

Plaintiff,

12

v.

13

Case No. 2:17-cv-02503-KJD-VCF

LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT,

ORDER

14
Defendant.
15
16
Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (#5) of Magistrate
17
Judge Cam Ferenbach entered November 13, 2017, recommending that Plaintiff’s complaint be
18
dismissed with prejudice. Though the time for doing so has passed, Plaintiff has failed to file any
19
objections to the Report and Recommendation.
20
The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28
21
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and LR IB 3-2. Plaintiff failed to immediately file written notification with the
22
Court of any change of address as is required by LSR 2-2. Failure to comply with this Rule is
23
additional grounds for dismissal of this action. Thus, the Court determines that the Report and
24
Recommendation (#5) of the United States Magistrate Judge entered November 13, 2017, should be
25
ADOPTED and AFFIRMED.
26

1
2

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
(#5) entered November 13, 2017, are ADOPTED and AFFIRMED;

3

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice;

4

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter JUDGMENT for Defendant

5
6

and against Plaintiff.
DATED this 4th day of December 2017.

7
8
9
10

_____________________________
Kent J. Dawson
United States District Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2