Banks v. Berryhill

Filing 23

ORDER. The Court DENIES 21 Defendant's motion for access to sealed document as moot. The Court GRANTS 22 Defendant's motion to extend time. Defendant's response to Plaintiff's motion to remand is due on or before 9/24/18. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/19/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
11

WILLIE BANKS,

12

Plaintiff(s),

13

NANCY A. BERRYHILL,

15

ORDER

v.

14

Case No.: 2:17-cv-02554-JAD-NJK

Defendant(s).

16

(Docket Nos. 21, 22)

Pending before the Court are Defendant’s motion for access to sealed document and motion

17 to extend time to respond to Plaintiff’s motion to remand. Docket Nos. 21, 22. Defendant submits
18 that she is unable to access the document filed as an exhibit to Plaintiff’s motion to remand at
19 Docket No. 20-1, which is filed under seal. Docket No. 21 at 2. After the filing of the instant
20 motions, the Court was made aware by the Clerk’s Office that counsel for Defendant now has
21 access to the document at issue.
22

Additionally, Defendant asks the Court for a 60-day extension to file her response to

23 Plaintiff’s motion to remand. Docket No. 22; see also Docket No. 20. Defendant submits that she
24 requires additional time “to review the document and prepare her response” because she cannot
25 access the document attached to Plaintiff’s motion to remand. Docket No. 22 at 2.
26 //
27 //
28
1

1

Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion for access to sealed document as

2 moot. Docket No. 21. For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to extend
3 time. Docket No. 22. Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s motion to remand is due on or before
4 September 24, 2018.
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

Dated: July 19, 2018

7

______________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2