Doucet v. Conam Management Corporation

Filing 13

ORDER granting 10 Defendant's Request to Excuse Attendance of Insurance Carrier Representative at Early Neutral Evaluation. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 11/14/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 MARY DOUCET, 6 7 8 9 10 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ) CONAM MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) Case No.: 2:17-cv-02571-GMN-PAL ORDER 11 12 This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Request to Excuse Attendance of Insurance 13 Carrier Representative at Early Neutral Evaluation (ECF No. 10), filed on November 2, 2017. 14 Plaintiff filed a Limited Opposition (ECF No. 12) on November 13, 2017. 15 Defendant requests that its insurance representative, who resides in New York, be excused 16 from personal attendance at the Early Neutral Evaluation (“ENE”) set for December 7, 2017. 17 Defendant represents that it believes the insurance representative is not necessary at the ENE because 18 it believes that the settlement value of this matter is well below its self-insured retention rate of 19 $100,000.00. Plaintiff represents that she does not have a problem with Defendant’s insurance 20 representative remaining in New York. However, Plaintiff requests that Defendant’s insurance 21 representative be made available by telephone during the time of the ENE. Therefore, the Court will 22 grant Defendant’s request and instructs Defendant to ensure that its insurance representative is 23 available via telephone at the time of the ENE. According, 24 25 26 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Request to Excuse Attendance of Insurance Carrier Representative at Early Neutral Evaluation (ECF No. 10) is granted. DATED this 14th day of November, 2017. 27 28 ______________________________________ GEORGE FOLEY, JR. United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?