Kinslow v. Alorica, Inc.

Filing 21

ORDER granting 20 Stipulation; Re: 13 Motion to Stay Case, Responses due by 11/21/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/20/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Case 2:17-cv-02577-APG-GWF Document 20 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6

OGLTREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK, &
STEWART, P.C.
Anthony L. Martin, Nev. Bar No. 8177
Wells Fargo Tower, Suite 1500
3800 Howard Hughes Parkway
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Tel. [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

12

WEISBART SPRINGER HAYES LLP
Julie A Springer (Pro Hac Vice Pending)
Matt C. Wood (Pro Hac Vice Pending)
Nicole LeFave (Pro Hac Vice Pending)
212 Lavaca, Suite 200
Austin, TX 78701
Tel. [phone]
Fax. [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

13

Attorneys for Defendant Alorica, Inc.

7
8
THIERMAN BUCK, LLP
7287 Lakeside Drive
Reno, NV 89511
[phone] Fax [phone]
Email: [e-mail]; www.thiermanbuck.comt

THIERMAN BUCK, LLP
Mark R. Thierman, Nev. Bar No. 8285
Joshua D. Buck, Nev. Bar No. 12187
Leah L. Jones, Nev. Bar No. 13161
7287 Lakeside Drive
Reno, Nevada 89511
Tel. [phone]
Fax. [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Lakiesha Kinslow
on behalf of heself and all others
similarly situated.

9
10
11

14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

17
18

Case No.: 2:17-cv-02577-APG-GWF

LAKIESHA KINSLOW, on behalf of herself
and all others similarly situated,

19

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE
THEIR RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO COMPEL

Plaintiffs,

20

Vs.

21

ALORICA, INC. and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive

22
23

(First Request)
ORDER

Defendant(s).

24

Pursuant to Local Rule (“LR”) IA 6-1 and LR 26-4, Plaintiff LAKIESHA KINSLOW

25

(“Plaintiff”), by and through her counsel of record THIERMAN BUCK, LLP, and Defendants

26

ALORICA, INC, (“Defendant”) by and through their counsel of record OGLETREE,

27

DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK, & STEWART, P.C., and WEISBART SPRINGER HAYES,

28

LLP, hereby request and stipulate that Plaintiff be allowed an additional seven (7) day extension
-1-

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE THEIR RESPONSE
TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL

Case 2:17-cv-02577-APG-GWF Document 20 Filed 11/13/17 Page 2 of 3

1

of time, from Tuesday, November 14, 2017 up until Tuesday, November 21, 2017 to file with

2

the Court, Plaintiff’s’ Response to Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration or, in the

3

alternative, Motion to Stay. (ECF No. 13.) This is the Parties first request for an extension of

4

time to extend the deadlines to file Plaintiff’s response.
Procedurally, this case is in its infancy. Plaintiff filed her original complaint in the

6

District Court, Clark County, Nevada on September 6, 2017 and Jury Demand on September 11,

7

2017. Plaintiff’s complaint alleges seven (7) causes of action for: (1) Failure to Pay Wages for

8
THIERMAN BUCK, LLP
7287 Lakeside Drive
Reno, NV 89511
[phone] Fax [phone]
Email: [e-mail]; www.thiermanbuck.comt

5

All Hours Worked in Violation of 29 U.S.C. § 201, et. seq; (2) Failure to Pay Overtime in

9

Violation of 29 U.S.C. § 207; (3) Failure to Compensate for All Hours Worked in Violation of

10

NRS 608.140 and 608.016; (4) Failure to Pay Minimum Wages in Violation of the Nevada

11

Constitution; (5) Failure to Pay Overtime in Violation of NRS 608.140 and 608.018; (6) Failure

12

to Timely Pay All Wages Due and Owing in Violation of NRS 608.140 and 608.020-050; and

13

(7) Breach of Contract. Defendant removed to this Court on October 3, 2017. (ECF No. 1.)

14

Defendant answered on October 11, 2017. (ECF No. 8.) On October 31, 2017 Defendant filed

15

its Motion to Compel Arbitration and, in the alternative, Motion to Stay (ECF No. 10 -10-6 and

16

ECF No. 13-13-6, respectively.) The Parties held their FRCP 26(f) conference on November 1,

17

2017 and timely filed their Joint Status Report on November 2, 2017. (ECF No. 16.) No

18

discovery has been completed as of this date.

19

///

20

///

21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
-2-

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE THEIR RESPONSE
TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL

Case 2:17-cv-02577-APG-GWF Document 20 Filed 11/13/17 Page 3 of 3

1

This request is made in good faith and not intended for purposes of delay. The Parties

2

are requesting a brief extension of the deadline for Plaintiff to file her response due to a

3

tentative agreement to settle Plaintiff’s claims.

4

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

5

Dated this 13th day of November 2017.

Dated this 13th day of November 2017.

THIERMAN BUCK, LLP

OGLTREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK,
& STEWART, P.C.

/s/ Joshua D. Buck
Mark R. Thierman, Esq., Bar No. 8285
Joshua D. Buck, Esq., Bar No. 12187
Leah L. Jones, Esq., Bar No. 13161
7287 Lakeside Drive
Reno, Nevada 89511

/s/ Anthony L. Martin
Anthony L. Martin, Nev. Bar No. 8177
Wells Fargo Tower, Suite 1500
3800 Howard Hughes Parkway
Las Vegas, NV 89169

6
7

THIERMAN BUCK, LLP
7287 Lakeside Drive
Reno, NV 89511
[phone] Fax [phone]
Email: [e-mail]; www.thiermanbuck.comt

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

WEISBART SPRINGER HAYES LLP
Matt C. Wood (Pro Hac Vice)
212 Lavaca, Suite 200
Austin, TX 78701

15
16

Attorneys for Defendants

17
18
19

ORDER

20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of November, 2017.

, 2017.

22
23
24
25

U.S. District/Magistrate Judge JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT

26
27
28
-3-

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE THEIR RESPONSE
TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL