Kluge v. Lee et al
Filing
13
ORDER Granting 12 Stipulation Concerning Service of Process and Staying the Case. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/21/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:17-cv-02578-APG-CWH Document 12 Filed 11/17/17 Page 1 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Pat Lundvall (NVSBN 3761)
McDonald Carano LLP
2300 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 1200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Tel: (702) 873-4100
plundvall@mcdonaldcarano.com
James V. Masella, III (pending admission pro hac vice)
Jesse A. Townsend (pending admission pro hac vice)
PATTERSON BELKNAP WEBB & TYLER LLP
1133 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036-6710
Tel: (212) 336-2000
jmasella@pbwt.com
jtownsend@pbwt.com
Attorneys for Defendants Robert Lee, Steven Roberts, Edward Yew, Jon Tondeur, and Brian Morales
and Nominal Defendant Zoompass Holdings, Inc.
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
14
15
VALERIE KLUGE, Derivatively on behalf of
Nominal Defendant, ZOOMPASS HOLDINGS
INC.,
16
Plaintiff,
17
18
19
20
v.
ROBERT LEE, STEVEN ROBERTS,
EDWARD (TED) YEW, JON TONDEUR AND
BRIAN MORALES,
21
22
23
24
25
Case No. 2:17-cv-02578-APG-CWH
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONCERNING SERVICE OF
PROCESS AND STAYING
PROCEEDINGS
Defendants,
and
ZOOMPASS HOLDINGS, INC.
Nominal
Defendant.,
26
27
WHEREAS Plaintiff Valerie Kluge filed her Complaint on October 4, 2017 in which she
28
alleged, among other things, breaches of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and waste of corporate
Case 2:17-cv-02578-APG-CWH Document 12 Filed 11/17/17 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:17-cv-02578-APG-CWH Document 12 Filed 11/17/17 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:17-cv-02578-APG-CWH Document 12 Filed 11/17/17 Page 4 of 6
/s/ Pat Lundvall
IT IS SO ORDERED.
_______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: November 21, 2017.
Case 2:17-cv-02578-APG-CWH Document 12 Filed 11/17/17 Page 5 of 6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?