Kluge v. Lee et al

Filing 13

ORDER Granting 12 Stipulation Concerning Service of Process and Staying the Case. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/21/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-02578-APG-CWH Document 12 Filed 11/17/17 Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Pat Lundvall (NVSBN 3761) McDonald Carano LLP 2300 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 1200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Tel: (702) 873-4100 plundvall@mcdonaldcarano.com James V. Masella, III (pending admission pro hac vice) Jesse A. Townsend (pending admission pro hac vice) PATTERSON BELKNAP WEBB & TYLER LLP 1133 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036-6710 Tel: (212) 336-2000 jmasella@pbwt.com jtownsend@pbwt.com Attorneys for Defendants Robert Lee, Steven Roberts, Edward Yew, Jon Tondeur, and Brian Morales and Nominal Defendant Zoompass Holdings, Inc. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 15 VALERIE KLUGE, Derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant, ZOOMPASS HOLDINGS INC., 16 Plaintiff, 17 18 19 20 v. ROBERT LEE, STEVEN ROBERTS, EDWARD (TED) YEW, JON TONDEUR AND BRIAN MORALES, 21 22 23 24 25 Case No. 2:17-cv-02578-APG-CWH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONCERNING SERVICE OF PROCESS AND STAYING PROCEEDINGS Defendants, and ZOOMPASS HOLDINGS, INC. Nominal Defendant., 26 27 WHEREAS Plaintiff Valerie Kluge filed her Complaint on October 4, 2017 in which she 28 alleged, among other things, breaches of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and waste of corporate Case 2:17-cv-02578-APG-CWH Document 12 Filed 11/17/17 Page 2 of 6 Case 2:17-cv-02578-APG-CWH Document 12 Filed 11/17/17 Page 3 of 6 Case 2:17-cv-02578-APG-CWH Document 12 Filed 11/17/17 Page 4 of 6 /s/ Pat Lundvall IT IS SO ORDERED. _______________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: November 21, 2017. Case 2:17-cv-02578-APG-CWH Document 12 Filed 11/17/17 Page 5 of 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?