I-View Now, LLC v. Police Priority, Inc.
Filing
25
ORDER Re: Defendant Police Priority's 24 Motion for Order Shortening Time. Motion Hearing set for 4/16/2018 at 02:30 PM in LV Courtroom 3D before Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. Responses to 24 Motion due by 3/30/2018. Replies due by 4/6/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 3/21/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
I-VIEW NOW, LLC,
5
Plaintiff,
6
7
vs.
POLICE PRIORITY, INC.,
8
9
10
2:17-cv-02604-RFB-VCF
ORDER
Defendant.
Before the Court is Defendant Police Priority’s Motion for Order Shortening Time re: Rule 26(C)
Motion to Stay Discovery and Obligations Under the Local Patent Rules (ECF No. 24).
11
Accordingly,
12
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a hearing on Defendant Police Priority’s Motion for Order
13
Shortening Time re: Rule 26(C) Motion to Stay Discovery and Obligations Under the Local Patent Rules
14
(ECF No. 24) is scheduled for 2:30 PM, April 16, 2018, in Courtroom 3D.
15
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any opposition to Defendant Police Priority’s Motion for Order
16
Shortening Time re: Rule 26(C) Motion to Stay Discovery and Obligations Under the Local Patent Rules
17
(ECF No. 24) must be filed on or before March 30, 2018. Any reply in support of Defendant Police
18
Priority’s Motion for Order Shortening Time re: Rule 26(C) Motion to Stay Discovery and Obligations
19
Under the Local Patent Rules (ECF No. 24) must be filed on or before April 6, 2018. The parties must
20
address Plaintiff’s suggestion that limited discovery be allowed to determine whether this court has
21
jurisdiction, as raised in the Opposition to Defendant Police Priority’s Motion to Dismiss for Improper
22
Venue (ECF No. 15, page 2),
23
24
25
DATED this 21st day of March, 2018.
_________________________
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?