M&P Venture Partners L.L.C. v. MACO Construction Services, Inc. et al

Filing 8

ORDER Granting 7 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to 1 Complaint. MACO Construction Services, Inc. answer due 11/28/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 11/16/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

1 Lars K. Evensen, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8061
2 Joseph G. Went, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9220
3 Sydney R. Gambee, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 14201
4 HOLLAND & HART LLP
9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor
5 Las Vegas, Nevada 89134
Phone: [phone]
6 Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
7
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff
9 M&P Venture Partners L.L.C.

HOLLAND & HART LLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11
9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89134

10

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

12 M&P VENTURE PARTNERS L.L.C., an
Arizona corporation,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
MACO CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.,
16 an Arizona corporation; and WESTERN
SURETY COMPANY, a surety;
17
Defendants.
18

CASE NO: 2:17-cv-02610-RFB-GWF
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY
NOT MORE THAN 15 DAYS
Assigned to:
Hon. Richard F. Boulware, II
Hon. George W. Foley, Jr.
Complaint File:
Trial Date:

October 6, 2017
Not Set

19
20

Plaintiff M&P Venture Partners, L.L.C. (“M&P”) and Defendant MACO Construction

21

Services, Inc. (“MACO”) hereby stipulate, by and through their respective attorneys of record, as

22

follows:

23
24
25

1.

M&P filed this action on October 6, 2017, alleging breach of contract, recovery on

Miller Act payment bond, and related claims against MACO and Western Surety Company.
2.

The principals for MACO and M&P are in direct negotiations to resolve the

26

payment dispute which is the subject of the above-captioned action. To accommodate these

27

negotiations, MACO has requested an extension of its responsive pleading deadline. Because this

28

brief extension will allow the parties to resolve their dispute and possible without further litigation,
Page 1 of 2
10423206_1

1

good cause exists to extend the responsive pleading deadline.

2

3.

This is the first time that an extension has been requested in the case.

3

4.

Based on the foregoing, the parties have agreed to extend MACO’s time to respond

4

to the Complaint to November 28, 2017.

5

SO STIPULATED.

6

Dated this 15th day of November, 2017.

7

HOLLAND & HART LLP

Dated this 15th day of November, 2017.

8
9
10
11
HOLLAND & HART LLP

9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89134

12

By:
/s/Joseph G. Went, Esq.
Lars K. Evensen, Esq.
Joseph G. Went, Esq.
Sydney R. Gambee, Esq.
9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor
Las Vegas, Nevada 89134
Attorneys for Plaintiff
M&P Venture Partners, L.L.C

By:
/s/David W. Smiley
David W. Smiley, Esq. (NV Bar 11714)
FINCH, THORNTON & BAIRD, LLP
4747 Executive Drive, Suite 700
San Diego, California 92121
Loren Young, Esq. (NV Bar 7567)
LINCOLN, GUSTAFSON & CERCOS, LLP
3960 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169

13
14

Attorneys for Defendant MACO Construction
Services, Inc.

15
16
17
18

IT IS SO ORDERED:

19
______________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20
21

DATED:

22

November 16, 2017
__________________________

23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 2
10423206_1