McCollum-Gibson v. SFC of Nevada, LLC et al

Filing 10

ORDER Granting 9 Stipulation to Extend Time re 1 Complaint. SFC of Nevada, LLC's answer due 11/30/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 11/16/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-02614-GMN-GWF Document 9 Filed 11/15/17 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 400 S. Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 TEL: (702) 362-7800 / FAX: (702) 362-9472 KOLESAR & LEATHAM 10 MICHAEL R. BROOKS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 007287 KOLESAR & LEATHAM 400 S. Rampart Blvd., Ste. 400 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Telephone: (702) 362-7800 mbrooks@klnevada.com CHARLES T. MEYER (State Bar No. 11842) SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation The Atrium 19100 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 700 Irvine, California 92612 Telephone: (949) 442-7110 Facsimile: (949) 442-7118 ctm@severson.com Attorneys for Defendant SFC OF NEVADA, LLC d/b/a MAVERICK FINANCE 11 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 15 16 DEMETRIOUS MCCOLLUM-GIBSON, 17 CASE NO. 2:17-cv-02614-GMN-GWF Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT 18 vs. 19 20 SFC OF NEVADA, LLC D/B/A MAVERICK FINANCE; EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC; TRANS UNION, LLC, Action Filed: Trial Date: October 6, 2017 None Set 21 Defendants 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff DEMETRIOUS MCCOLLUM-GIBSON (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant SFC OF NEVADA, LLC d/b/a MAVERICK FINANCE (“Maverick” or “Defendant”) hereby stipulate as follows: RECITALS 27 28 1. Plaintiff filed this action against Maverick October 6, 2017 and served Maverick 12592.0006/10976098.1 Page 1 of 4 Case 2:17-cv-02614-GMN-GWF Document 9 Filed 11/15/17 Page 2 of 4 1 on October 11, 2017. 2 2. Maverick’s initial deadline to respond to the complaint is November 1, 2017. 3 3. Plaintiff has agreed to extend the time for Maverick to respond to the complaint 4 up to and including November 30, 2017, so that Maverick may have additional time to 5 investigate this matter and the parties may explore the possibility of settlement. 6 7 8 4. This change in deadline will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order, local rules, or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. THEREFORE, the parties stipulate as follows: 9 400 S. Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 TEL: (702) 362-7800 / FAX: (702) 362-9472 KOLESAR & LEATHAM 10 11 12 13 14 15 STIPULATION 1. The deadline for Maverick to respond to the complaint shall be continued to November 30, 2017. 2. This change in deadline will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order, local rules, or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: November 15, 2017 16 Respectfully submitted, HAINES & KRIEGER 17 19 /s/ Rachel Saturn By:____________________________________ Rachel Saturn David Krieger 20 Attorneys for Plaintiff Wilbur C. Gibson 18 21 DATED: November 15, 2017 Respectfully submitted. 22 KOLESAR & LEATHAM 23 /s/ Michael R. Brooks By:_____________________________________ Michael R. Brooks 24 25 Attorneys for Defendant SFC OF NEVADA, LLC d/b/a MAVERICK FINANCE 26 27 28 12592.0006/10976098.1 Page 2 of 4 Case 2:17-cv-02614-GMN-GWF Document 9 Filed 11/15/17 Page 3 of 4 1 DATED: November 15, 2017 Respectfully submitted. 2 SEVERSON & WERSON 3 /s/ Charles T. Meyer By:_____________________________________ Charles T. Meyer 4 5 Attorneys for Defendant SFC OF NEVADA, LLC d/b/a MAVERICK FINANCE 6 7 8 ORDER 9 400 S. Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 TEL: (702) 362-7800 / FAX: (702) 362-9472 KOLESAR & LEATHAM 10 GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 16 November 2017 DATED this ___ day of _________ 2017 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 12592.0006/10976098.1 Page 3 of 4 Case 2:17-cv-02614-GMN-GWF Document 9 Filed 11/15/17 Page 4 of 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?