Argabright v. Berryhill

Filing 15

ORDER Granting 14 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to file Defendant's answer re 7 Complaint (First Request). Nancy A. Berryhill answer due 1/15/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 12/19/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STEVEN W. MYHRE, NVBN 9635 United States Attorney District of Nevada RICHARD M. RODRIGUEZ Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 Telephone No. (415) 977-8926 Facsimile No. (415) 977-0134 Email Address: richard.rodriguez@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 MELISSA ARGABRIGHT, 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 16 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 17 ) ) Case No. 2:17-CV-02630-APG-GWF ) ) ) UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ) EXTENSION OF TIME AND PROPOSED ) ORDER ) (FIRST REQUEST) ) ) ) 18 19 Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) 20 respectfully requests that the Court extend the time for Defendant to file her Answer to the Complaint, 21 due on December 18, 2017, by 28 days, through and including January 15, 2018. An extension of time is needed in order to prepare Defendant’s Answer because the 22 23 Commissioner is still in the process of assembling and finalizing the administrative record. This request 24 is made in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. 25 \\\ 26 \\\ -1- 1 2 3 Counsel for Defendant conferred Cyrus Safa of Plaintiff’s counsel’s office, by telephone who has no opposition to this motion, on December 18, 2017. Respectfully submitted this 18th day of December 2017. 4 5 6 7 8 9 STEVEN W. MYHRE, NVBN 9635 United States Attorney /s/ Richard M. Rodriguez RICHARRD M. RODRIGUEZ Special Assistant United States Attorney 10 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED: 14 15 Hon. GEORGE W. FOLEY, JR. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 DATED: 12/19/2017 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?