Williamson v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
Filing
8
ORDER Granting 7 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. AETNA will disclose a copy of the ERISA administrative record by 1/15/2018. See Order for further deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 12/21/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:17-cv-02653-RFB-CWH Document 7 Filed 12/19/17 Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
Julie A. Mersch, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 004695
LAW OFFICE OF JULIE A. MERSCH
701 S.7th Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101
(702) 387-5868
Fax (702) 387-0109
jam@merschlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff Sondra Williamson
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
SONDRA WILLIAMSON
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
)
as Claims Administrator for the Bank of
)
America Long-Term Disability Plan; DOES I )
through V; and ROE CORPORATIONS I
)
through V, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-02653-RFB-CWH
DISCOVERY PLAN AND
SCHEDULING ORDER
(Special Scheduling Review
Requested)
16
17
Plaintiff SONDRA WILLIAMSON and Defendant AETNA LIFE INSURANCE
18
COMPANY (“AETNA”) jointly request special scheduling review and submit the following
19
discovery plan and order for this case.
20
I.
Rule 26(f) Conference.
21
In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), a telephonic conference was held on
22
December 18, 2017 between Julie A. Mersch, counsel for the Plaintiff, and Ann-Martha
23
Andrews, counsel for AETNA. The parties agree that the standard discovery plan is not best
24
suited for this lawsuit, for the reasons set forth below. The parties further certify, pursuant to
25
LR 26-1(b)(7-8), that they have met and conferred regarding the possibility of using alternate
26
dispute-resolution processes and alternate forms of case disposition including consent to trial
DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER (Special Scheduling Review Requested)
1
Case 2:17-cv-02653-RFB-CWH Document 7 Filed 12/19/17 Page 2 of 4
1
by a magistrate judge and the use of the Short Trial Program. The provisions of LR 26-
2
1(b)(9) do not apply as no jury trial is demanded in this matter.
3
II.
Nature of Case and Purpose of Special Review.
4
This claim involves payment of long-term disability benefits under a group insurance
5
plan administered by WILLIAMSON’s employer, Bank of America (Plan Administrator) for
6
the benefit of its employees. Bank of America delegated the administration of claims under
7
the plan to Defendant AETNA (Claims Administrator). The Plaintiff’s complaint alleges a
8
claim under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et
9
seq. (“ERISA”), seeking, inter alia, reinstatement of long-term disability benefits terminated
10
by AETNA and payment of past benefits. This action is brought pursuant to § 502(a)(1)(B)
11
of ERISA (29 U.S.C. §§ 1132 (a)(1)(B)). Discovery may be limited to the administrative
12
record for Plaintiff’s administrative claim and appeal. The administrative record consists of
13
the information that was before Defendant at the time of its final decision, which includes,
14
inter alia, Plaintiff’s medical records, Plaintiff’s arguments for the payment of benefits, the
15
Plan Administrator’s and Claim Administrator’s decisions, and the long-term disability plan
16
documents.
17
No discovery plan and scheduling order is generally required for review of an
18
administrative record. LR 16-1(c)(1). An action for an administrative review usually requires
19
that the parties file a briefing schedule. LR 16-1(c). Accordingly, the parties jointly request
20
that this Court review and adopt the proposed non-standard discovery and case schedule set
21
forth below:
22
III.
23
The parties have conferred and agree as follows:
24
A.
25
26
Proposed Plan
Production of the Administrative Record: AETNA will disclose a
copy of the ERISA administrative record by Monday, January 15, 2018.
B.
Meet and Confer Period: WILLIAMSON contends that she is entitled to
DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER (Special Scheduling Review Requested)
2
Case 2:17-cv-02653-RFB-CWH Document 7 Filed 12/19/17 Page 3 of 4
1
conduct discovery in this matter. AETNA does not concede that discovery is appropriate or
2
permissible under the facts of this case.
3
Accordingly, WILLIAMSON will notify AETNA by Monday, January 29, 2018 as
4
to the type of discovery and scope of discovery that she contends is permissible and should
5
be conducted, with reasonable specificity (including proposed written discovery where
6
possible). The parties will then meet and confer with each other to (1) identify areas of
7
agreement about permissible ERISA discovery; and (2) narrow the discovery requests, if
8
possible, to gain agreement about permissible ERISA discovery and narrow areas of dispute
9
about permissible areas of ERISA discovery. Any discovery that the parties agree is
10
11
permissible ERISA discovery shall be served by Monday, February 12, 2018.
C.
Briefing re: ERISA Discovery Disputes: To the extent that, after the meet
12
and confer period, the parties disagree as to the permissible scope of discovery and type of
13
discovery, on or before Wednesday, February 28, 2018, the parties will simultaneously
14
brief the Court and request a ruling on any remaining disputes. Each party will set forth its
15
position in no more than 10 pages. If further discovery is permitted, the Court may set a
16
reasonable time deadline for completion of discovery at that time.
17
D.
Filing of ERISA Administrative Record and Briefing of the Merits of the
18
Case: If no discovery briefs are filed under Paragraph III.C., above, on or before
19
Wednesday, April 4, 2018, Defendant will file the administrative record with this Court, the
20
contents of which will be agreed upon by the parties.
21
If a joint administrative record is timely filed and simultaneous motions are not filed
22
under Paragraph III.C., above, Plaintiff’s Rule 52 and/or Rule 56 Motion shall be filed by
23
Wednesday, May 2, 2018. Defendant’s response will be due on Friday, June 1, 2018, and
24
Plaintiff’s reply memoranda will be due Friday, June 15, 2018.
25
26
If discovery motions are filed under Paragraph III.C., above, the deadlines set forth in
this Paragraph III.D. will be suspended. The parties will propose new deadlines after any
DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER (Special Scheduling Review Requested)
3
Case 2:17-cv-02653-RFB-CWH Document 7 Filed 12/19/17 Page 4 of 4
1
discovery motion has been ruled upon, to take into account any additional discovery time
2
permitted.
3
IV.
4
The parties intend to engage in early settlement discussions, and may agree to a
5
6
Settlement.
mediation or settlement conference.
DATED: December 19, 2017
LAW OFFICE OF JULIE A. MERSCH
7
By:
8
9
10
/s/ Julie A. Mersch
JULIE A. MERSCH
jam@merschlaw.com
Nevada Bar No.: 004695
701 S. 7th Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Attorney for Plaintiff WILLIAMSON
11
12
DATED: December 19, 2017
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
13
14
15
16
17
By:
/s/ Ann-Martha Andrews
ANN-MARTHA ANDREWS
ann.andrews@ogletree.com
Nevada Bar No.
Esplanade Center III, Suite 800
2415 East Camelback Road
Phoenix, AZ 85016
Attorneys for Defendant AETNA
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED:
20
December_21, 2017
Dated this
day of
, 2017.
21
22
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
23
24
25
26
DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER (Special Scheduling Review Requested)
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?