Saubhayana v. Sessions et al
Filing
33
ORDER Granting 32 Motion to Extend Time re 31 Order (Third Request). Amended Complaint deadline: 5/18/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 4/15/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
SYLVIA L. ESPARZA, ESQ. NV #8444
Law Office of Sylvia L. Esparza
3340 Pepper Lane, Suite 105
Las Vegas, Nevada 89120
(702) 853-0233
Fax (702) 853-0234
Sylvia@sylviaesparzalaw.com
Counsel for Plaintiff,
Sathirawat Saubhayana
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
9
10
SATHIRAWAT SAUBHAYANA
11
Plaintiff
12
vs.
13
14
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney
General, et al.,
Defendants
15
16
***
)…CASE NO. 2:17-cv-02655-JAD-GWF
)…Agency No. 087 026 142
)
) UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND
) TIME TO AMEND COMPLAINT
)
)
)
)
)
)
17
Plaintiff, Sathirawat Saubhayana, through his Counsel hereby moves to extend the time
18
for the filing of the amended complaint until May 18, 2020. The current filing deadline is April
19
16, 2020. The requested extension of time is based on the following:
20
21
1. This is a challenge to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (“USCIS”)
22
decision to deny Plaintiff’s application for naturalization. See 8 U.S.C. §1241(c).
23
24
2. Undersigned counsel requires additional time to file the amended complaint due to
25
recent outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”), which has impacted
26
our office and ability to meet various deadlines.
27
///
28
///
1
1
3. Defendants, through counsel, indicated that they do not oppose this motion for an
2
extension of time, by email on April 15, 2020. To that end, Plaintiff requests an
3
additional 30 days to respond, until May 18, 2020.
4
5
6
7
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Sylvia L. Esparza__
Sylvia L. Esparza, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
13
_________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
Dated: April 15, 2020
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?