Westenberger v. Albertson's LLC

Filing 21

ORDER granting 20 Stipulation to Continue. The Joint Status Report shall be filed by September 24, 2018. FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing on this matter currently set for August 28, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. is continued to October 2, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/23/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-02661-JAD-PAL Document 20 Filed 08/21/18 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Jack P. Burden, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 6918 Xiao Wen Jin, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 13901 BACKUS, CARRANZA & BURDEN 3050 South Durango Drive Las Vegas, NV 89117 T: (702) 872-5555 F: (702) 872-5545 jburden@backuslaw.com shirleyjin@backuslaw.com Attorneys for Defendant Albertson’s LLC 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 JACKIE WESTENBERGER, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 14 ALBERTSONS LLC, a Foreign Limited Liability Company; DOES I through X; and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, 15 Defendants. ) ) Case No. 2:17-cv-02661-JAD-PAL ) ) STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ) CONTINUE HEARING ) ) ) ) ) ) 16 Defendant Albertson’s LLC (“Defendant”), by and through its counsel of record, Jack P. 17 Burden, Esq. and Xiao Wen Jin, Esq. of the law firm BACKUS, CARRANZA & BURDEN, and 18 Plaintiff Jackie Westenberger (“Plaintiff”), by and through her counsel of record, Marcus A. Berg, 19 Esq. and Boyd B. Moss III, Esq. of MOSS BERG INJURY LAWYERS, hereby stipulate and agree as 20 follows: 21 1. On July 31, 2018, the Court held a hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Strike (ECF No. 14) 22 and Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Reply (ECF No. 17). 23 2. The Court ordered at the hearing, among other things, that the parties to select a forensic 24 computer examiner to conduct a review of the computer to verify from the metadata 25 1 Case 2:17-cv-02661-JAD-PAL Document 20 Filed 08/21/18 Page 2 of 3 1 whether these materials were or were not served as represented by Mr. Hansen and by Mr. 2 Berg. See Minutes of Proceedings (ECF No. 19). The Court set the matter for further 3 proceedings for August 28, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. and ordered a joint status report to be filed 4 by August 24, 2018. 5 3. On August 3, 2018, an appointment was set with the forensic examiner. 6 4. On August 6, 2018, the forensic examiner began collecting data. 7 5. On August 11, 2018, the forensic examiner completed the collection of data. 8 6. On or about August 17, 2018, the forensic examiner requested Defendant’s counsel to 9 extend the Joint Status Report deadline of August 24, 2018 as additional time may be 10 needed for analysis. 11 12 13 7. Therefore, the parties respectfully request a thirty-day (30) extension of the Joint Status Report deadline and hearing date as follows: Current Deadline Proposed Deadline Joint Status Report August 24, 2018 September 24, 2018 Hearing 14 Item August 28, 2018 September 27, 2018 or at such later date and time set by the Court 15 16 17 18 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 19 20 21 22 23 24 DATED: August 21, 2018 DATED: August 21, 2018 BACKUS, CARRANZA & BURDEN MOSS BERG INJURY LAWYERS /s/ Jack P. Burden Jack P. Burden, Esq. Xiao Wen Jin, Esq. 3050 South Durango Drive Las Vegas, NV 89117 Attorneys for Defendant /s/ Marcus A. Berg Marcus A. Berg, Esq. Boyd B. Moss III, Esq. 4101 Meadows Lane, Suite 110 Las Vegas, NV 89107 Attorney for Plaintiff 25 2 Case 2:17-cv-02661-JAD-PAL Document 20 Filed 08/21/18 Page 3 of 3 ORDER 1 2 Upon review of the Stipulation by the parties, the Court hereby orders as follows: 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Joint Status Report shall be filed by September 24, 4 5 6 7 2018. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing on this matter currently set for August 28, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. is continued to October 2, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of August , 2018. 8 9 10 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?