Westenberger v. Albertson's LLC
Filing
21
ORDER granting 20 Stipulation to Continue. The Joint Status Report shall be filed by September 24, 2018. FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing on this matter currently set for August 28, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. is continued to October 2, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/23/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Case 2:17-cv-02661-JAD-PAL Document 20 Filed 08/21/18 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Jack P. Burden, Esq.
Nevada State Bar No. 6918
Xiao Wen Jin, Esq.
Nevada State Bar No. 13901
BACKUS, CARRANZA & BURDEN
3050 South Durango Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89117
T: (702) 872-5555
F: (702) 872-5545
jburden@backuslaw.com
shirleyjin@backuslaw.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Albertson’s LLC
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
JACKIE WESTENBERGER,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
14
ALBERTSONS LLC, a Foreign Limited Liability
Company; DOES I through X; and ROE
CORPORATIONS I through X,
15
Defendants.
)
) Case No. 2:17-cv-02661-JAD-PAL
)
) STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
) CONTINUE HEARING
)
)
)
)
)
)
16
Defendant Albertson’s LLC (“Defendant”), by and through its counsel of record, Jack P.
17
Burden, Esq. and Xiao Wen Jin, Esq. of the law firm BACKUS, CARRANZA & BURDEN, and
18
Plaintiff Jackie Westenberger (“Plaintiff”), by and through her counsel of record, Marcus A. Berg,
19
Esq. and Boyd B. Moss III, Esq. of MOSS BERG INJURY LAWYERS, hereby stipulate and agree as
20
follows:
21
1. On July 31, 2018, the Court held a hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Strike (ECF No. 14)
22
and Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Reply (ECF No. 17).
23
2. The Court ordered at the hearing, among other things, that the parties to select a forensic
24
computer examiner to conduct a review of the computer to verify from the metadata
25
1
Case 2:17-cv-02661-JAD-PAL Document 20 Filed 08/21/18 Page 2 of 3
1
whether these materials were or were not served as represented by Mr. Hansen and by Mr.
2
Berg. See Minutes of Proceedings (ECF No. 19). The Court set the matter for further
3
proceedings for August 28, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. and ordered a joint status report to be filed
4
by August 24, 2018.
5
3. On August 3, 2018, an appointment was set with the forensic examiner.
6
4. On August 6, 2018, the forensic examiner began collecting data.
7
5. On August 11, 2018, the forensic examiner completed the collection of data.
8
6. On or about August 17, 2018, the forensic examiner requested Defendant’s counsel to
9
extend the Joint Status Report deadline of August 24, 2018 as additional time may be
10
needed for analysis.
11
12
13
7. Therefore, the parties respectfully request a thirty-day (30) extension of the Joint Status
Report deadline and hearing date as follows:
Current Deadline
Proposed Deadline
Joint Status Report
August 24, 2018
September 24, 2018
Hearing
14
Item
August 28, 2018
September 27, 2018 or at
such later date and time
set by the Court
15
16
17
18
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
19
20
21
22
23
24
DATED: August 21, 2018
DATED: August 21, 2018
BACKUS, CARRANZA & BURDEN
MOSS BERG INJURY LAWYERS
/s/ Jack P. Burden
Jack P. Burden, Esq.
Xiao Wen Jin, Esq.
3050 South Durango Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89117
Attorneys for Defendant
/s/ Marcus A. Berg
Marcus A. Berg, Esq.
Boyd B. Moss III, Esq.
4101 Meadows Lane, Suite 110
Las Vegas, NV 89107
Attorney for Plaintiff
25
2
Case 2:17-cv-02661-JAD-PAL Document 20 Filed 08/21/18 Page 3 of 3
ORDER
1
2
Upon review of the Stipulation by the parties, the Court hereby orders as follows:
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Joint Status Report shall be filed by September 24,
4
5
6
7
2018.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing on this matter currently set for August 28,
2018 at 9:30 a.m. is continued to October 2, 2018, at 9:00 a.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED this
23rd
day of
August
, 2018.
8
9
10
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?