Djordjevic-Mikic et al v. Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange

Filing 17

ORDER that 16 Stipulated Discovery Plan and Proposed Scheduling Order is DENIED without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that the parties must file a revised discovery plan and proposed scheduling order in accordance with the Local Rules no later th an February 8, 2018. The parties must also include a certification that they have read the text of Local Rule 26-1(b), effective as amended May 1, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 1/25/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

SLOBODANKA DJORDJEVIC-MIKIC,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
PRIVILEGE UNDERWRITERS RECIPROCAL )
EXCHANGE, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________________ )

Case No. 2:17-cv-02667-JCM-CWH

ORDER

Presently before the Court is the parties’ stipulated discovery plan and proposed scheduling

11

order (ECF No. 16), filed on January 24, 2018. The parties previous submitted a proposed

12

scheduling order (ECF No. 14), which was rejected by the Court for failure to include the

13

declarations required under Local Rule 26-1(b). Upon review, the parties’ revised proposal does not

14

include the declarations required under Local Rule 26-1(b).

15
16
17

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties’ stipulated discovery plan and proposed
scheduling order (ECF No. 16) is DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties must file a revised discovery plan and proposed

18

scheduling order in accordance with the Local Rules no later than February 8, 2018. The parties

19

must also include a certification that they have read the text of Local Rule 26-1(b), effective as

20

amended May 1, 2016.

21

DATED: January 25, 2018

22
23

_________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge

24
25
26
27
28
1