Carley v. Gentry et al

Filing 100

ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion Requesting (ECF No. 94 ) is DENIED. Defendants' Motion to Strike or File under Seal (ECF No. 95 ) is GRANTED. Clerk is directed to seal Plaintiff's Motion Requesting (ECF No. 94 ). Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time (ECF No. 99 ) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 6/22/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3

***
ELIZABETH CARLEY,

4

Plaintiff,
2:17-cv-02670-MMD-VCF
ORDER

5
6

vs.
JO GENTRY, et al.,

7

Defendants.

8
9

Before the court are Plaintiff’s Motion Requesting Service (ECF No. 94), Defendants’ Motion To

10

Strike Or File Under Seal (ECF NO. 95), and Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Time to Reply to Defendants’

11

Answer (ECF No. 99).

12
13
14
15

On April 22, 2020, all named Defendants in Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 89)
filed their answer to the operative Third Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 93).
All defendants with claims currently pending against them have appeared in this case. Plaintiff’s
Motion Requesting Service (ECF No. 94) is denied.

16

Plaintiff’s motion requesting service (ECF No. 94) listed the home address of Defendant Hill. The

17

court has sealed all prior documents listing Defendant Hill’s address but Plaintiff is somehow able to

18

obtain Defendant Hill’s home address. Under LR IC 6-1(a), “[p]arties must refrain from including—or

19

must partially redact, where inclusion is necessary—the following personal-data identifiers from all

20

documents filed with the court, including exhibits, whether filed electronically or in paper, unless the court

21

orders otherwise.”

22

Defendants’ request to seal plaintiff’s motion is granted.

23

Plaintiff requests an extension of time to file a reply to Defendants’ Answer. (ECF No. 99).

24

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedures 7(a)(7), a party may file a reply to an answer if the Court

25

orders one. Here, the Court has not ordered Plaintiff to file a reply to the answer. No reply may be filed.

1

Accordingly,

2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion Requesting (ECF No. 94) is DENIED.

3

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion To Strike Or File Under Seal (ECF NO.

4

95) is GRANTED.

5

The Clerk’s office is directed to seal Plaintiff’s Motion Requesting (ECF No. 94).

6

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Time to Reply to Defendants’

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Answer (ECF No. 99) is DENIED.
DATED this 22nd day of June, 2020.
_________________________
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE