Carley v. Gentry et al
Filing
173
ORDER Granting 172 Stipulation to Extend Deadline. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 8/29/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 6/27/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
AARON D. F ORD
At t or n ey Gen er a l
CH RISTOP H E R M. GUY (Ba r No. 15239)
Depu t y At t or n ey Gen er a l
St a t e of Neva da
Office of t h e At t or n ey Gen er a l
555 Ea st Wa sh in gt on Aven u e
Su it e 3900
La s Vega s, Neva da 89101
(702) 486-3326 (ph on e)
(702) 486-3773 (fa x)
E m a il: cgu y@a g.n v.gov
Attor n eys for Defen d a n ts J a m es Dzu r en d a , Ch a r les Da n iels,
S h er yl F oster , J o Gen tr y, Ta n ya H ill, Ga br iela Na jer a ,
Dwigh t Neven , Cyn th ia Ru iz, Kim Th om a s, a n d P a tr ick Veja r
LISA A. RASMUSSE N, E sq.
La w Offices of Kr ist ina Wildeveld & Associa t es
550 Ea st Ch a r lest on Blvd.
La s Vega s, Neva da 89101
(702) 222-0007 (ph on e)
(702) 222-0001 (fa x)
E m a il: Lisa @veldla w.com
Attor n eys for P la in tiff
15
U N I T E D S T AT E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T
16
D I S T R I C T O F N E VAD A
17
E LIZABE TH CARLE Y,
18
P la in t iff,
19
v.
20
J O GE NTRY, et a l.,
21
Ca se No. 2:17-cv-02670-MMD-VCF
J O I N T S T I P U L AT I O N AN D O R D E R
T O E XT E N D T H E J O I N T P R E T R I AL
O R D E R D E AD L I N E F R O M J U N E 27,
2022, T O AU G U S T 29, 2022
(T h ir d R e q u e s t )
Defen da n t s.
22
P la in t iff E liza bet h Ca r ley, by a n d t h r ou gh cou n sel, Lisa . A. Ra sm u ssen , a n d
23
Defen da n t s, Sh er yl F ost er , P a t r ick Veja r , J o Gen t r y, J a m es Dzu r en da , Ch a r les Da n iels,
24
Ga br iela Na jer a , Ta n ya H ill, Dwigh t Neven , Cyn t h ia Ru iz, a n d Kim Th om a s, by a n d
25
t h r ou gh cou n sel, Aa r on D. F or d, Neva da At t or n ey Gen er a l, a n d Ch r ist oph er M. Gu y,
26
Depu t y At t or n ey Gener a l, of t h e St a t e of Neva da , Office of t h e At t or n ey Gen er a l, h er eby
27
su bm it a J oin t St ipu la t ion An d Or der To Ext en d Th e J oin t P r et r ia l Or der Dea dlin e F r om
28
J u n e 27, 2022, t o Mo n d a y , Au g u s t 29, 2022.
P a ge 1 of 4
1
I.
INTR ODUCTION
2
Th e P a r t ies h er eby m ove t o ext en d t h e J oin t P r et r ia l Or der dea dlin e fr om J u n e 27,
3
2022, t o Au gu st 29, 2022 (63 da ys). Good ca u se exist s in t h is ca se beca u se t h e P a r t ies h a ve
4
r esu m ed set t lem en t discu ssion s a n d m a y be a ble t o r esolve t his m a t t er wit h ou t fu r t h er
5
lit iga t ion . Addit ion a lly, bot h cou n sel for P la in t iff a n d Defen da n t s a ssu m ed lit iga t ion
6
r espon sibilit ies for t h is m a t t er post sum m a r y ju dgm en t briefin g. P la in t iff’s cou n sel
7
a ppea r ed in t h is m a t t er a s r ecen t a s J a n u a r y 25, 2022, for t h e pu r pose of a set t lem en t
8
con fer en ce. 1 E CF No. 163. Th e P a r t ies a gr ee t h a t a ddit ion a l t im e is n ecessa r y t o r eview
9
t h e discover y r ecor ds pr odu ced in t h is m a t t er t o su bm it a J oin t P r et r ia l Or der .
10
11
II.
L AW AN D AR G U ME N T
A.
La w
12
F eder a l Ru le of Civil P r ocedu r e 6(b)(1) 2 pr ovides:
13
(1) In Gen er a l. Wh en a n a ct m a y or m u st be don e wit hin a
specified t im e, t h e cou r t m a y, for good ca u se, ext en d t h e t im e:
(A) wit h or wit h ou t m ot ion or n ot ice if t h e cou r t a ct s, or if
a r equ est is m a de, befor e t h e or igin a l t im e or it s ext en sion
expir es; or
(B) on m ot ion m a de a ft er t h e t im e h a s expir ed if t h e pa r t y
fa iled t o a ct beca u se of excu sa ble n eglect .
14
15
16
17
18
F E D . R. C IV. P . 6(b)(1).
Th e Un it ed St a t es Su pr em e Cou r t
h a s r ecogn ized, “Ru le 6(b) gives t h e
19
cou r t exten sive flexibility t o m odify t h e fixed t im e per iods fou nd t h r ou gh ou t t h e r u les,
20
wh et h er t h e en la r gem en t is sou gh t befor e or a ft er t h e a ct u a l t er m in a t ion of t h e a llot t ed
21
t im e.” Luja n v. Na t'l Wild life F ed ., 497 U.S. 871, 906 n . 7 (1990) (in t er n a l qu ot a t ion m a r ks
22
a n d cit a t ion om it t ed) (em ph a sis a dded); see a lso P er ez-Den ison v. Ka iser F ou n d . H ea lth
23
P la n of th e Nw., 868 F . Su pp. 2d 1065, 1079 (D. Or . 2012) (cit in g a n d qu ot in g Lu ja n , 497
24
25
26
27
28
Th is set t lem en t con fer en ce wa s m or e a kin t o a globa l set t lem en t con fer en ce a s t wo
of P la in t iff’s ca ses wer e a t issu e: t h e ot h er ca se bein g 2:17-cv-02346-MMD-CLB.
2 LR IA 6-1(a ): “A m ot ion or st ipu la t ion t o ext en d t im e m u st st a t e t h e r ea son s for t h e
ext en sion r equ est ed a n d m u st in for m t h e cou r t of a ll pr eviou s ext en sion s of t h e su bject
dea dlin e t h e cou r t gr a n t ed.” F u r t h er , a “st ipu la t ion or m ot ion seekin g t o ext en d t h e t im e
t o file a n opposit ion or r eply t o a m ot ion , or t o ext en d t h e t im e fixed for h ea r in g a m ot ion ,
m u st st a t e in it s open in g pa r a gr a ph t h e filin g da t e of t h e su bject m ot ion or t h e da t e of t h e
su bject h ea r in g.” LR IA 6-1(c).
1
P a ge 2 of 4
1
U.S. a t 906). F u r t h er , t h is r u le, like a ll t h e F eder a l Ru les of Civil P r ocedu r e, is t o be
2
liber a lly con st r u ed t o effect u a t e t h e gen er a l pu r pose of seein g t h a t ca ses (a n d ot h er
3
dispu t ed issu es) a r e decided on t h e m er it s. Ah a n ch ia n v. Xen on P ictu r es, In c., 624 F .3d
4
1253, 1258 (9t h Cir . 2010). Rega r din g “Good ca u se,” it is a n on -r igor ou s st a n da r d t h a t h a s
5
been con st r u ed br oa dly a cr oss pr ocedu r a l a n d st a t u t or y con t ext s. Id . (cit in g sever a l cir cu it s
6
Ven ega s–H er n a n d ez v. S on olu x Recor d s, 370 F .3d 183, 187 (1st Cir .2004); Th om a s v.
7
Br en n a n , 961 F .2d 612, 619 (7t h Cir .1992); Lola tch y v. Ar th u r Mu r r a y, In c., 816 F .2d 951,
8
954 (4t h Cir .1987)).
9
Con sequ en t ly, r equ est s for ext en sion s of t im e m a de befor e t h e a pplica ble dea dlin e
10
h a s pa ssed sh ou ld “n or m a lly ... be gr a n t ed in t h e a bsen ce of ba d fa it h on t h e pa r t of t h e
11
pa r t y seekin g r elief or pr eju dice t o t h e a dver se pa r t y.” Ah a n ch ia n , 624 F .3d a t 1259
12
(qu ot in g 4B Ch a r les Ala n Wr igh t & Ar t h u r R. Miller , F eder a l P r a ct ice a n d P r ocedu r e §
13
1165 (3d ed. 2004).
14
B.
15
On J u n e 23, 2022, t he P a r t ies m eet a n d con fer r ed a bou t t h e st a t u s of t h e ca se. Th e
16
P a r t ies r en ewed set t lem en t discu ssion s a s P la in t iff’s cir cu m st a n ces h a ve ch a n ged n ow t h a t
17
sh e r esides in t r a n sit ion a l h ou sin g. Th e P a r t ies a gr eed t h a t P la in t iff’s n ew cir cu m st a n ce
18
sh ou ld be con sider ed for set t lem en t pu r poses a n d pr esen t n ew oppor t u n it ies for set t lem en t
19
t h a t wer e n ot con sider ed a t t h e Ma r ch 24, 2022, set t lem en t con fer en ce. Th e P a r t ies do n ot
20
a ct in ba d fa it h . Th ey a r e eva lu a t in g t h e issu es a n d set t lem en t possibilit y in good fa it h .
Ag r e e m e n t
21
Addit ion a lly, t h e P a rt ies seek a ddit ion a l t im e t o wor k t oget h er t o dr a ft t h e J oin t
22
P r et r ia l Or der . Th e P a r t ies a r e wor kin g t oget h er t o det er m in e wh a t r ecor ds wer e pr odu ced
23
pr ior t o cou n sels’ a ppea r a n ces in t h is m a t t er . Th e a ddit ion a l t im e is n ecessa r y t o t h e
24
dr a ft in g a n d a gr eem en t t o a join t or der . Thu s, t h e P a r t ies r equ est a n ext en sion of t h e J oin t
25
P r et r ia l Or der dea dlin e of J u n e 27, 2022, t o Au gu st 29, 2022.
26
///
27
///
28
///
P a ge 3 of 4
1
2
3
III.
CONCLUSION
F or t h e for egoing r ea son s, t h e P a r t ies r equ est a n ext en sion of t h e J oin t P r et r ia l
Or der dea dlin e of J u n e 27, 2022, t o Au gu s t 29, 2022.
4
5
DATE D t h is 24t h da y of J u n e 2022
DATE D t h is 24t h da y of J u n e 2022
6
7
8
9
10
By: /s/ _Lisa A. Ra sm u ssen ______________
LISA A. RASMUSSE N, E sq.
La w Offices of Kr ist ina Wildeveld &
Associa t es
550 E . Ch a r lest on Blvd.
La s Vega s, Neva da 89101
Attor n eys for P la in tiff
By: /s/ Ch r ist oph er M. Gu y _______
CH RISTOP H E R M. GUY
Depu t y At t or n ey Gen er a l
Office of t h e Neva da At t or n ey Gen er a l
555 E . Wa sh in gt on Aven u e, #3900
La s Vega s, Neva da 89101
Attor n eys for Defen d a n ts
11
12
IT IS SO ORDE RE D.
13
14
15
_______________________________________
UNITE D STATE S MAGISTRATE J UDGE
6-27-2022
DATE : ________________________________
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
P a ge 4 of 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?