Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust et al v. Diversified Concrete Cutting, Inc. et al

Filing 38

ORDERED that Defendant Mercurio must pay the amount of $2,371.65 to Plaintiffs. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Mercurio is to make the payment to Plaintiffs no later than October 17, 2018 unless an objection is filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 10/3/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 *** 8 9 10 11 12 TRUSTEES OF THE OPERATING ENGINEERS PENSION TRUST, et al., Case No. 2:17-cv-02686-APG-GWF Plaintiffs, ORDER v. DIVERSIFIED CONCRETE CUTTING, INC., et al., Defendants. 13 14 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Memorandum in Support of Fees and Costs 15 Request (ECF NO. 34), filed on August 9, 2018. No party has filed an opposition and the time for 16 response has now expired. 17 18 BACKGROUND On May 11, 2018, Plaintiffs filed their motion for judgment debtor exam (ECF No. 17) 19 and on May 15, 2018, the Court granted their motion. See ECF No. 19. The Court ordered 20 Defendant Mercurio to appear for a judgment debtor examination on June 22, 2018. Defendant 21 Mercurio did not appear for the judgment debtor examination as ordered. On July 3, 2018, 22 Plaintiffs filed their motion for order to show cause (ECF No. 26) and on July 26, 2018, the 23 Court conducted a hearing in this matter. On July 27, 2018, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ motion 24 for order to show cause and awarded Plaintiffs’ reasonable costs and attorney’s fees incurred in 25 preparing and filing their motion for order to show cause. 26 DISCUSSION 27 The Supreme Court has held that reasonable attorney fees must “be calculated according 28 to the prevailing market rates in the relevant community,” considering the fees charged by 1 1 “lawyers of reasonably comparable skill, experience, and reputation.” Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 2 886, 895-96 n. 11, 104 S.Ct. 1541 (1984). Courts typically use a two-step process when 3 determining fee awards. Fischer v. SJB-P.D. Inc., 214 F.3d 1115, 1119 (9th Cir. 2000). First, the 4 Court must calculate the lodestar amount “by taking the number of hours reasonably expended on 5 the litigation and multiplying it by a reasonable hourly rate.” Id. Furthermore, other factors should 6 be taken into consideration such as special skill, experience of counsel, and the results obtained. 7 Morales v. City of San Rafael, 96 F.3d 359, 364 n. 9 (9th Cir. 1996). “The party seeking an award 8 of fees should submit evidence supporting the hours worked and rates claimed . . . [w]here the 9 documentation of hours is inadequate, the district court may reduce the award accordingly.” 10 Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 433 (1983). Second, the Court “may adjust the lodestar, [only 11 on rare and exceptional occasions], upward or downward using a multiplier based on factors not 12 subsumed in the initial calculation of the lodestar.” Van Gerwen v. Guarantee Mut. Life Co., 214 13 F.3d 1041, 1045 (9th Cir. 2000). 14 Defendants request attorney’s fees in the amount of $2,511.00 for time expended in the 15 matter as well $472.65 for costs related to the order to show cause against Defendant Mercurio 16 for a total of $2,983.65. The amount is based on work performed by Nathan R. Ring, Esq. and at 17 an hourly rate of $360.00 and work performed by April Denni and Ryann Milton, paralegals 18 employed by Plaintiffs’ counsel’s office, at an hourly rate of $110.00. After reviewing 19 Plaintiffs’ counsel’s affidavit and itemized billing entries, the Court finds that $2,511.00 for fees 20 to prepare Plaintiff’s motion for order to show cause is excessive. The Court finds that the hours 21 involved in preparing Plaintiff’s motion for an order to show cause and labor related to such 22 motion should take no more than 5.0 hours of attorney labor. Therefore, the Court will reduce 23 Plaintiff’s attorney’s fees’s request by $612.00 to a total of $1,899.00. As a result, the Court will 24 award reasonable attorney’s fees in the amount of $1,899.00 and costs in the amount of $472.65 25 for a total of $2,371.65. Accordingly, 26 ... 27 ... 28 ... 2 1 2 3 4 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Mercurio must pay the amount of $2,371.65 to Plaintiffs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Mercurio is to make the payment to Plaintiffs no later than October 17, 2018 unless an objection is filed. Dated this 3rd day of October, 2018. 6 7 GEORGE FOLEY, JR. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?