Bell v. Core Civic et al

Filing 71

ORDER Denying Defendants' 69 Motion to Extend/Stay Deadline to Respond to 67 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants' Responses due by 1/10/2020. Plaintiff will have 14 days after service of that Response to file any Reply. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 12/23/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 Cameron Bell, 5 Case No. 2:17-cv-02709-JAD-BNW Plaintiff Order Denying Motion to Extend Time v. 6 [ECF No. 69] Core Civic, et al., 7 Defendant 8 Pro se prisoner Cameron Bell sues Core Civic, the operator of the Nevada Southern 9 10 Detention Center, Warden Killian, and corrections officer McMurtrey for battery, negligence, 11 and negligent infliction of emotional distress. 1 Discovery has closed and both sides have moved 12 for summary judgment. But, because there were numerous other discovery-related and 13 scheduling-order related motions pending when Bell filed his cross motion for summary 14 judgment, 2 defendants moved to extend or stay the deadline for their response until after those 15 other motions could be resolved. 3 The magistrate judge has now denied those other pending 16 motions. 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Extend/Stay 17 18 Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff’s Cross-motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 69] is 19 DENIED as moot. Defendants have until January 10, 2020, to file their response to Bell’s 20 21 1 22 ECF No. 15 (screening order). 2 ECF No. 67. 23 3 ECF No. 69. 4 ECF No. 70. 1 cross-motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 67]; Bell will have 14 days after service of that 2 response to file any reply. 3 _________________________________ U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey Dated: December 23, 2019 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?