Braunstein v. Dzurenda

Filing 4

ORDER denying ECF No. 1 IFP application; giving Petitioner 30 days to pay $5.00 filing fee; directing Clerk to send Petitioner two copies of this order (mailed 11/20/2017), one to be returned with filing fee payment. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/20/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 10 STEVEN BRAUNSTEIN, Petitioner, 11 12 13 14 15 vs. 2:17-cv-02731-APG-CWH ORDER JAMES DZURENDA , et al., Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner has submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis and a petition for a writ 18 of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.1 ECF No. 1 The court finds that petitioner is able to 19 pay the full filing fee of five dollars ($5.00). 20 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 21 1) is DENIED. Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date that this order is entered to have 22 the filing fee of five dollars ($5.00) sent to the clerk of the court. Failure to comply will result in the 23 dismissal of this action. 24 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall send petitioner two copies of this 25 26 27 28 1 Though styled as a proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, the petition seeks relief from custody imposed by a state court judgment, which places it under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See White v. Lambert, 370 F.3d 1002, 1007 (9th Cir. 2004) (confirming that § 2254 is the exclusive avenue for a state court prisoner to challenge the constitutionality of his detention). 1 order. Petitioner is ordered to make the necessary arrangements to have one copy of this order attached 2 to the check paying the filing fee. 3 DATED: November 20, 2017. 4 5 6 _________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?