Snap Lock Industries, Inc. v. Swisstrax Corporation
Filing
134
ORDER Granting 131 Motion to Continue Re: 102 Motion to Compel, 92 Motion for Protective Order. Motion Hearing reset for 11/14/2019 at 03:30 PM in LV Courtroom 3B before Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 10/16/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:17-cv-02742-RFB-BNW Document 131 Filed 10/09/19 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
J. Stephen Peek
Nevada Bar No. 1758
HOLLAND & HART LLP
9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89134
Phone: (702) 222-2544
Fax: (702) 669-4650
speek@hollandhart.com
raloosvelt@hollandhart.com
10
Brett L. Foster (pro hac vice admission)
Tamara L. Kapaloski (pro hac vice admission)
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
111 S. Main Street Suite 2100
Salt Lake City, UT 84111-2176
Telephone: (801) 933-7360
Facsimile: (801) 933-7373
foster.brett@dorsey.com
kapaloski.tammy@dorsey.com
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff Snap Lock Industries, Inc.
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
13
14
SNAP LOCK INDUSTRIES, INC.,
15
16
17
Plaintiff,
vs.
SWISSTRAX CORPORATION,
18
Case No. 2:17-cv-02742-RFB-BNW
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO
RESCHEDULE OCTOBER 31, 2019
HEARING AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
(FIRST REQUEST)
Defendant.
19
20
Plaintiff Snap Lock Industries, Inc. (“Snap Lock”) and Defendant Swisstrax Corporation
21
(“Swisstrax”) (collectively, “Parties”), through their undersigned counsel, hereby respectfully jointly
22
submit this Stipulated Request to Reschedule October 31, 2019 Hearing, and state as follows:
23
1.
On October 8, 2019, the Court entered a Minute Order in Chambers, indicating that due
24
to scheduling conflicts, a hearing previously scheduled for October 15, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. is
25
rescheduled to October 31, 2019 at 3:30 p.m. See ECF No. 130.
26
27
2.
Due to previously scheduled commitments that fall on October 31, 2019, counsel for
Snap Lock respectfully requests that the October 31, 2019, hearing be rescheduled to the Court’s next
28
4852-8165-9528\1
Case 2:17-cv-02742-RFB-BNW Document 131 Filed 10/09/19 Page 2 of 3
1
available date. With the exception of November 21-22, Plaintiff’s counsel is available for the hearing
2
any day in November.
3
3.
Counsel for Swisstrax Corporation does not oppose this request.
4
4.
As such, the parties respectfully request that the hearing currently scheduled for October
5
31, 2019, at 3:30 p.m. be rescheduled to the Court’s next available date after that time.
6
5.
The Parties do not currently have a trial date.
7
6.
Good cause exists for this request. The Parties are not seeking the continuance for
8
purposes of undue delay.
9
10
Dated this 9th day of October, 2019.
11
12
13
14
15
16
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC
/s/ Tamara L. Kapaloski a;jfdlkajdklfajdl
Brett L. Foster
Tamara L. Kapaloski
Dorsey & Whitney, LLP
111 South Main Street, Suite 2100
Salt Lake City, UT 84111-2176
Email: foster.brett@dorsey.com
Email: kapaloski.tammy@dorsey.com
/s/ Steven A. Caloiaro a;jfdlkajdklfajdl
John L. Krieger
Steven A. Caloiaro
Christian T. Spaulding
8363 West Sunset Road, Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89113
Email: jkriger@dickinson-wright.com
Email: scaloiaro@dickinson-wright.com
Email: cspaulding@dickinson-wright.com
17
18
IT IS ORDERED that the unopposed motion (ECF No. 131) is GRANTED. The hearing
is reset for November 14, 2019, at 3:30 p.m. in courtroom 3B.
19
IT IS SO ORDERED:
20
____________________________________
Hon. Brenda Weksler
United States Magistrate Judge
October 16, 2019
DATED: ____________________________
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
4852-8165-9528\1
Case 2:17-cv-02742-RFB-BNW Document 131 Filed 10/09/19 Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
I hereby certify that on the 9th day of October, 2019, the foregoing UNOPPOSED MOTION
3
TO RESCHEDULE OCTOBER 31, 2019 HEARING AND [PROPOSED] ORDER was served
4
to all counsel of record via the Court’s CM/ECF system.
5
/s/ Tamara L. Kapaloski
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
4852-8165-9528\1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?