Snap Lock Industries, Inc. v. Swisstrax Corporation

Filing 134

ORDER Granting 131 Motion to Continue Re: 102 Motion to Compel, 92 Motion for Protective Order. Motion Hearing reset for 11/14/2019 at 03:30 PM in LV Courtroom 3B before Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 10/16/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-02742-RFB-BNW Document 131 Filed 10/09/19 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 J. Stephen Peek Nevada Bar No. 1758 HOLLAND & HART LLP 9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor Las Vegas, NV 89134 Phone: (702) 222-2544 Fax: (702) 669-4650 speek@hollandhart.com raloosvelt@hollandhart.com 10 Brett L. Foster (pro hac vice admission) Tamara L. Kapaloski (pro hac vice admission) DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 111 S. Main Street Suite 2100 Salt Lake City, UT 84111-2176 Telephone: (801) 933-7360 Facsimile: (801) 933-7373 foster.brett@dorsey.com kapaloski.tammy@dorsey.com 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff Snap Lock Industries, Inc. 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 14 SNAP LOCK INDUSTRIES, INC., 15 16 17 Plaintiff, vs. SWISSTRAX CORPORATION, 18 Case No. 2:17-cv-02742-RFB-BNW UNOPPOSED MOTION TO RESCHEDULE OCTOBER 31, 2019 HEARING AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (FIRST REQUEST) Defendant. 19 20 Plaintiff Snap Lock Industries, Inc. (“Snap Lock”) and Defendant Swisstrax Corporation 21 (“Swisstrax”) (collectively, “Parties”), through their undersigned counsel, hereby respectfully jointly 22 submit this Stipulated Request to Reschedule October 31, 2019 Hearing, and state as follows: 23 1. On October 8, 2019, the Court entered a Minute Order in Chambers, indicating that due 24 to scheduling conflicts, a hearing previously scheduled for October 15, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. is 25 rescheduled to October 31, 2019 at 3:30 p.m. See ECF No. 130. 26 27 2. Due to previously scheduled commitments that fall on October 31, 2019, counsel for Snap Lock respectfully requests that the October 31, 2019, hearing be rescheduled to the Court’s next 28 4852-8165-9528\1 Case 2:17-cv-02742-RFB-BNW Document 131 Filed 10/09/19 Page 2 of 3 1 available date. With the exception of November 21-22, Plaintiff’s counsel is available for the hearing 2 any day in November. 3 3. Counsel for Swisstrax Corporation does not oppose this request. 4 4. As such, the parties respectfully request that the hearing currently scheduled for October 5 31, 2019, at 3:30 p.m. be rescheduled to the Court’s next available date after that time. 6 5. The Parties do not currently have a trial date. 7 6. Good cause exists for this request. The Parties are not seeking the continuance for 8 purposes of undue delay. 9 10 Dated this 9th day of October, 2019. 11 12 13 14 15 16 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC /s/ Tamara L. Kapaloski a;jfdlkajdklfajdl Brett L. Foster Tamara L. Kapaloski Dorsey & Whitney, LLP 111 South Main Street, Suite 2100 Salt Lake City, UT 84111-2176 Email: foster.brett@dorsey.com Email: kapaloski.tammy@dorsey.com /s/ Steven A. Caloiaro a;jfdlkajdklfajdl John L. Krieger Steven A. Caloiaro Christian T. Spaulding 8363 West Sunset Road, Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89113 Email: jkriger@dickinson-wright.com Email: scaloiaro@dickinson-wright.com Email: cspaulding@dickinson-wright.com 17 18 IT IS ORDERED that the unopposed motion (ECF No. 131) is GRANTED. The hearing is reset for November 14, 2019, at 3:30 p.m. in courtroom 3B. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED: 20 ____________________________________ Hon. Brenda Weksler United States Magistrate Judge October 16, 2019 DATED: ____________________________ 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 4852-8165-9528\1 Case 2:17-cv-02742-RFB-BNW Document 131 Filed 10/09/19 Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 I hereby certify that on the 9th day of October, 2019, the foregoing UNOPPOSED MOTION 3 TO RESCHEDULE OCTOBER 31, 2019 HEARING AND [PROPOSED] ORDER was served 4 to all counsel of record via the Court’s CM/ECF system. 5 /s/ Tamara L. Kapaloski 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 4852-8165-9528\1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?