Snap Lock Industries, Inc. v. Swisstrax Corporation

Filing 149

ORDER granting 148 Motion to Extend Time; Re: 143 Order on Motion for Protective Order. Any objections to the Order are due on or before January 10, 2020, and any response to any such objections is due on or before January 24, 2020 Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 1/3/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Case 2:17-cv-02742-RFB-BNW Document 148 Filed 01/02/20 Page 1 of 3

1 DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC
John L. Krieger
2 Nevada Bar No. 6023
Email: [e-mail]
3 8363 West Sunset Road, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89113-2210
4 Tel: [phone]
5 Steven A. Caloiaro
Nevada Bar No. 12344
6 Email: [e-mail]
100 West Liberty Street, Suite 940
7 Reno, NV 89501
Tel: [phone]
8
Attorneys for Defendant/Counter-Claimant
9 Swisstrax Corporation
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

12

SNAP LOCK INDUSTRIES, INC. a Utah Case No: 2:17-cv-02742-RFB-PAL
13 corporation,
14
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

UNOPPOSED MOTION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND
vs.
DEADLINES FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE
16
OBJECTIONS TO ORDER AND FOR
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE
17 SWISSTRAX CORPORATION., a California
corporation,
(First Request)
18
Defendant/Counter-Claimant
19
15

20 AND ALL RELATED MATTERS.
21

Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Defendant Swisstrax Corporation (“Swisstrax”), through its

22 counsel of record, Dickinson Wright PLLC, hereby moves this Court for an Order extending the
23 fourteen-day deadline for objections to the Order that the Court issued on December 20, 2019
24 (ECF No. 143), and the fourteen-day deadline for any reply by Snap Lock Industries, Inc. (“Snap
25 Lock”) to such objections, as set forth below. Objections to the Order (ECF No. 143) are
26 currently due on or before January 3, 2020. Swisstrax respectfully requests that the deadline for
27 all objections be extended to January 10, 2020, and the deadline for any response by Snap Lock
28
1

Case 2:17-cv-02742-RFB-BNW Document 148 Filed 01/02/20 Page 2 of 3

1 be extended to January 24, 2020.
2

The Court held a hearing on December 18, 2019 wherein the Court heard argument

3 regarding Snap Lock’s Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 92) and Swisstrax’s Motion to
4 Compel (ECF No. 102). The Court entered a Minute Order on December 20, 2019, wherein the
5 Court ordered, inter alia, that Snap Lock’s Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 92) is granted,
6 and Swisstrax’s Motion to Compel (ECF No. 102) is denied. (See ECF No. 143.) The Minute
7 Order provided that “The Court makes findings as to both rulings in open court.” (ECF No. 143.)
8

Swisstrax intends to file objections to the Court’s Minute Order (ECF No. 143) and, in

9 furtherance, immediately ordered transcripts of the proceedings. Due to the Christmas holiday,
10 Swisstrax did not receive the transcripts until Monday, December 30, 2019. Due to the extended
11 time needed for Swisstrax to obtain the transcripts of the December 18, 2019 Motion hearing,
12 and the intervening Christmas and New Year’s holidays, Swisstrax requests the proposed
13 adjustments so Swisstrax may adequately prepare its Objections pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-1,
14 and so Snap Lock may prepare any Responses to the same. Undersigned counsel discussed the
15 foregoing Motion with opposing counsel, and opposing counsel indicated that it would not
16 oppose this Motion. This is the first request for an extension of time to file objections to the
17 Order (ECF No. 143). This Motion is filed in good faith and not for the purpose of delay, but to
18 allow counsel sufficient time to review the transcript in order to draft the objection.
19

DATED this 2nd day of January, 2020.

20

DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC

21

/s/ _/Steven A. Caloiaro__________________
Steven A. Caloiaro
100 W. Liberty Sreet, Suite 940
Reno, NV 89523
Email: [e-mail]

22
23
24
25
26
27

ORDER
Based on the foregoing Unopposed Motion, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

28 ORDERED that the fourteen-day deadlines pursuant to Local Rules IB 3-1(a) for objections to
2

Case 2:17-cv-02742-RFB-BNW Document 148 Filed 01/02/20 Page 3 of 3

1 the Court’s December 20, 2019 Order, and for any response by Snap Lock, are extended as
2 follows: any objections to the Order are due on or before January 10, 2020, and any response to
3 any such objections is due on or before January 24, 2020.
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5

DATED: 1/3/20

6
Hon. Brenda Weksler
United States Magistrate Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3