Rivera v. Daniel Bogden, et al
Filing
95
ORDER Denying 94 Motion to set a status conference. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are instructed to file a joint pretrial order pursuant to LR 16-3 and 16-4 within 30 days of this order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/11/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
RUDY RIVERA,
8
Plaintiff(s),
9
10
Case No. 2:17-CV-2776 JCM (NJK)
ORDER
v.
DANIEL BOGDEN, et al.,
11
Defendant(s).
12
13
14
Presently before the court is plainitff’s motion to set a status conference in the matter
of Rivera v. Daniel Bogden, et al., case number 2:17-cv-02776-JCM-NJK. (ECF No. 94).
15
On May 28, 2021, the Ninth Circuit filed an opinion reversing and remanding this
16
court’s summary judgment in favor of defendant CoreCivic, formerly Corrections Corporation
17
of America. (ECF No. 89). The order on mandate was entered in this court on June 25, 2021.
18
(ECF No. 92). No further activity has transpired until plaintiff’s filing of the instant motion to
19
set a status conference. (ECF No. 94).
20
21
The court does not find a status conference necessary. The parties shall meet and confer
and file a joint pretrial order pursuant to LR 16-3 and 16-4 within 30 days of this order.
22
Accordingly,
23
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that plaintiff’s motion to
24
set a status conference (ECF No. 94) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.
25
...
26
...
27
...
28
...
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
1
2
3
4
5
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are instructed to file a joint pretrial order
pursuant to LR 16-3 and 16-4 within 30 days of this order.
DATED April 11, 2022.
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?