Clement v. Colvin et al

Filing 41

ORDER granting 40 Stipulation; Re: 33 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 10/4/2018. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/12/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-02787-JCM-PAL Document 40 Filed 09/12/18 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 THOMAS J. GIBSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 3995 GIBSON LAW GROUP, PLLC 2340 East Calvada Blvd., # 5 Pahrump, Nevada 89048 Telephone: 775-209-1035 Facsimile: 775-624-9778 tgibson@gibsonlawgroup.net Attorney for Plaintiff The undersigned does hereby affirm that this document does not contain the social security number of any person. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA GIBSON LAW GROUP, PLLC. 2340 E. Calvada Blvd.,Suite 5 Pahrump, NV 89048 (775)209-1035 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 MARK CLEMENT, Case No: 2:17-cv-02787-JCM-PAL Plaintiff, vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, in her representative capacity of the Social Security Administration, COMERICA BANK, a financial services company, and XEROX, a corporation, 17 STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME TO RESPOND TO FEDERAL DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Third Stipulation) Defendants. 18 19 Pursuant to LR 6-1 and LR 26-4, the parties, by and through their respective counsel of 20 record, with good cause appearing, hereby stipulate and request that the Court enlarge Plaintiff’s 21 time to respond to Federal Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss filed with this Court on August 06, 22 2018 [ECF #33]. 23 24 25 Whereby the original response date was due on or before August 20, 2018, the parties 26 and their counsel stipulated to enlarge the deadline [ECF #33], which was granted by the 27 Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on August 20, 2018 [ECF #36] extending the deadline to 28 respond to Thursday, August 30, 2018. The parties stipulated to a second extension of time to Page 1 of 3 Case 2:17-cv-02787-JCM-PAL Document 40 Filed 09/12/18 Page 2 of 3 1 respond to U.S. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss by September 13, 2018, of which the Court 2 granted [ECF #39]. The Parties hereby stipulate to a third extension of time to respond to the 3 Motion to Dismiss [ECF #33] in order to facilitate the possibility of a resolution without the 4 necessity of litigation. Therefore, the Parties request the new deadline to respond to said motion 5 6 be enlarged to October 4th, 2018. DATED this 12th day September, 2018. DATED this 12th day September, 2018. GIBSON LAW GROUP, PLLC DAYLE ELIESON United States Attorney /s/Thomas J. Gibson. THOMAS J. GIBSON, ESQ. 2340 East Calvada Boulevard, #5 Pahrump, NV 89048 Attorney for Plaintiff /s/Mark E. Woolf MARK E. WOOLF Assistant United States Attorney 501 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89101 Attorneys for Federal Defendant 7 8 9 GIBSON LAW GROUP, PLLC. 2340 E. Calvada Blvd.,Suite 5 Pahrump, NV 89048 (775)209-1035 10 11 12 13 14 ORDER 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff’s deadline to respond to Federal Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is now October 4th, 2018. 18 _____________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE STATES DISTRICT JUDGE September 12, 2018 DATED: ____________________________ 19 20 21 22 Respectfully submitted by: GIBSON LAW GROUP, PLLC 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/Thomas J. Gibson ____ THOMAS J. GIBSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 3995 2340 East Calvada Blvd., # 5 Pahrump, Nevada 89048 Telephone: 775-209-1035 Facsimile: 775-624-9778 Attorney for Plaintiff Page 2 of 3 Case 2:17-cv-02787-JCM-PAL Document 40 Filed 09/12/18 Page 3 of 3 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 3 I DO HEREBY CERTIFY that service of the foregoing STIPULATION TO ENLARGE 4 TIME TO RESPOND TO FEDERAL DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Third 5 Stipulation) was made on all parties via the Court’s Electronic Case Filing System. 6 7 8 Dated this 12th day of September, 2018 9 GIBSON LAW GROUP, PLLC. 2340 E. Calvada Blvd.,Suite 5 Pahrump, NV 89048 (775)209-1035 10 11 ___/s/Sunny Dean An agent of GIBSON LAW GROUP, PLLC 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?