Clerk v. Life Insurance Company Of North America et al

Filing 18

ORDER granting 17 Stipulation of Dismissal without prejudice as to Caesar's Entertainment Operating Company, Inc. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 11/29/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-02796-JAD-CWH Document 17 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 4 1 Anna Maria Martin (NV Bar No. 7079) amartin@mmhllp.com 2 MESERVE, MUMPER & HUGHES LLP 800 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 500 3 Los Angeles, California 90017-2611 Telephone: (213) 620-0300 4 Facsimile: (213) 625-1930 5 316 California Ave. #216 Reno, Nevada 89509 6 Attorneys for Defendant 7 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA and CAESAR’S ENTERTAINMENT OPERATING 8 COMPANY, INC. 9 Julie A. Mersch (NV Bar No. 4695) jam@merschlaw.com 10 LAW OFFICES OF JULIE A. MERSCH 701 S. 7th Street 11 Las Vegas, NV 89101 Telephone: (702) 387-5868 12 Facsimile: (702) 387-0109 13 Kevin M. Zietz (Pro Hac Vice) kevin@zietzlaw.com 14 LAW OFFICES OF KEVIN M. ZIETZ 15 Todd Krauss (Pro Hac Vice) todd@krausslaw.com 16 LAW OFFICES OF TODD KRAUSS & ASSOCIATES 16055 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 432 17 Encino, California 91436 Telephone: (818) 981-9200 18 Facsimile: (818) 981-9201 19 Attorneys for Plaintiff MARNICE CLERK 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAW OFFICES MESERVE, MUMPER & HUGHES LLP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA MARNICE CLERK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH ) AMERICA; CAESAR'S ENTERTAINMENT ) OPERATING COMPANY, INC and DOES 1 to ) 10, Inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) 1 159896.1 Case No. 2:17-cv-02796-JAD-CWH STIPULATION TO DISMISS CAESAR'S ENTERTAINMENT OPERATING COMPANY, INC. Case No. 2:17-cv-02796-JAD-CWH STIPULATION TO DISMISS CAESAR’S ENTERTAINMENT OPERATING CO., INC. Case 2:17-cv-02796-JAD-CWH Document 17 Filed 11/29/17 Page 2 of 4 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff MARNICE CLERK (“Plaintiff”) 1 2 and Defendants LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA (“LINA”) and 3 CAESAR’S ENTERTAINMENT OPERATING COMPANY, INC, by and through their respective 4 counsel, as follows: 1. 5 The Parties agree that this case is governed by the Employee Retirement Income 6 Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. Section 1001, et seq. 2. 7 LINA has confirmed that CAESAR’S ENTERTAINMENT OPERATING 8 COMPANY, INC., Long Term Disability Plan (the “Plan”) is funded by a policy of long term 9 disability insurance issued by LINA. 3. 10 In consideration for this Stipulation, LINA acknowledges and agrees that it will be 11 responsible for any judgment relating to disability benefits under the Plan, and attorney fees, if 12 awarded, as they relate to Plaintiff based on the allegations made in the Complaint against LINA in 13 the above-entitled action. 4. 14 The Parties therefore stipulate and request that Defendant CAESAR’S 15 ENTERTAINMENT OPERATING COMPANY, INC. be dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to 16 Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with the Parties to bear their own attorney fees and costs directly related to the 17 instant Stipulation and the dismissal of CAESAR’S ENTERTAINMENT OPERATING 18 COMPANY, INC. 19 5. LINA shall remain the only named defendant. 20 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 21 22 Dated: November 29, 2017 23 24 LAW OFFICES OF KEVIN M. ZIETZ Kevin M. Zietz By: /s/ Kevin M. Zietz Kevin M. Zietz Attorneys for Plaintiff MARNICE CLERK ORDER 25 26 27 Based on the parties’ stipulation [ECF No. 17] and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY (Signatures continued on next page) 28 ORDERED that all claims against defendant Caesar’s Entertainment Operating Company, LAW OFFICES MESERVE, MUMPER & HUGHES LLP Inc. are DISMISSED without prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and costs. 2 __________________________________ _______Case No. _2:17-cv-02796-JAD-CWH __ __ ______ _ _ _ STIPULATION TO DISMISS CAESAR’S 159896.1 U.S. District Judge Jennifer Dorsey t Judge Jennifer udg nif fe ENTERTAINMENT OPERATING CO., INC. November 29, 2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?