Utt v. Hillegass
Filing
16
ORDER Denying: 15 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. A renewed stipulated proposed discovery plan and scheduling order shall be filed no later than 12/29/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 12/26/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
MICHAEL UTT,
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
16
Pending before the Court is the parties’ stipulated proposed discovery plan and scheduling
17
order. Docket No. 15. On December 21, 2017, the Court denied without prejudice the parties’ first
18
stipulated proposed discovery plan because it included a blank space with reference to the date of
19
Plaintiff’s initial disclosures and failed to include the certifications required by Local Rule 26-1.
20
Docket No. 14; see also Docket No. 12 at 2. While the instant stipulated proposed discovery plan
21
includes the date of Plaintiff’s initial disclosures, it fails a second time to include the certifications
22
required by Local Rule 26-1. Docket No. 15. As a one-time courtesy to the parties, and in the
23
interest of preventing any further delay of a generally common requirement, the Court lays out the
24
parties’ specific failures regarding the certifications: the instant stipulated proposed discovery plan
25
does not include the required statement that the parties have met and conferred about the possibility
26
of using alternative dispute-resolution processes, pursuant to Local Rule 26-1(b)(7). The proposed
27
discovery plan also does not include the required statement that the parties have considered consent
28
to trial by a magistrate judge, pursuant to Local Rule 26-1(b)(8).
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
MATTHEW HILLEGASS,
14
Defendant.
Case No. 2:17-cv-02820-RFB-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 15)
1
Accordingly, the Court DENIES without prejudice the parties’ stipulated proposed discovery
2
plan. Docket No. 15. A renewed stipulated proposed discovery plan and scheduling order shall be
3
filed no later than December 29, 2017. The Court advises the party to review and keep in mind the
4
Local Rules without further involvement from the Court.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated: December 26, 2017
7
8
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?