Utt v. Hillegass
Filing
28
ORDER Denying without prejudice 25 Motion to Extend Time and 27 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/1/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
MICHAEL UTT,
10
Plaintiff(s),
11
v.
12
MATTHEW HILLEGASS, et al.,
13
Defendant(s).
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:17-cv-02820-RFB-NJK
ORDER
(Docket Nos. 25, 27)
15
Pending before the Court is a motion for extension and a motion for a medical examination.
16
Docket Nos. 25, 27. As an initial matter, it is not clear to the Court from the description of the pre-filing
17
conference that there is an actual dispute that a medical examination should occur. See Docket No. 25
18
at 2-4. To the extent the parties agree that there should be a medical examination, a court order
19
compelling one is not necessary and any renewed request may be limited to any extension necessary to
20
conduct that medical examination. See, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 29. In addition, it appears the pre-filing
21
conference with respect to the extension sought broke down based on a personality issue. See Docket
22
No. 25 at 4. The positions advanced in a pre-filing conference must be based on pertinent legal and
23
factual disputes. See, e.g., Nevada Power v. Monsanto, 151 F.R.D. 118, 120 (D. Nev. 1993). The Court
24
finds that a further meet-and-confer is in order with respect to the extension request.1
25
26
27
28
1
At any rate, the motion to extend does not provide sufficient information to address this request.
Most fundamentally, the motion does not address whether an IME must be completed before the expert
disclosure deadline (i.e., whether a doctor completing an IME is treated as an expert for disclosure deadline
purposes).
1
Accordingly, the motions are both DENIED without prejudice.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
DATED: March 1, 2018
4
5
______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?