Mantin v. Macies Store et al
Filing
7
ORDER accepting 6 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff Collis Mantin's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/30/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
COLLIS D. MANTIN,
5
6
7
8
Plaintiff,
v.
MACIES STORE, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 2:17-cv-02842-APG-NJK
ORDER ON REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
(ECF. NO. 6)
9
10
On April 9, 2018, Magistrate Judge Koppe entered a report and recommendation that I
11
dismiss this case without prejudice because plaintiff Collis Mantin did not pay the filing fee or
12
file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis by February 7, 2018, as ordered. ECF
13
No. 6. Mantin did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of
14
the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de
15
novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which
16
objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc)
17
(“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if
18
objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)).
19
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judge Koppes’s report and recommendation (ECF
20
No. 6) is accepted. Plaintiff Collis Mantin’s complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. The
21
clerk of court is instructed to close this case.
22
DATED this 30th day of April, 2018.
23
24
25
26
27
28
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?