Mantin v. Macies Store et al

Filing 7

ORDER accepting 6 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff Collis Mantin's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/30/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 COLLIS D. MANTIN, 5 6 7 8 Plaintiff, v. MACIES STORE, et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:17-cv-02842-APG-NJK ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF. NO. 6) 9 10 On April 9, 2018, Magistrate Judge Koppe entered a report and recommendation that I 11 dismiss this case without prejudice because plaintiff Collis Mantin did not pay the filing fee or 12 file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis by February 7, 2018, as ordered. ECF 13 No. 6. Mantin did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of 14 the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de 15 novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which 16 objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) 17 (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if 18 objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 19 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judge Koppes’s report and recommendation (ECF 20 No. 6) is accepted. Plaintiff Collis Mantin’s complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. The 21 clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 22 DATED this 30th day of April, 2018. 23 24 25 26 27 28 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?