Duhamel v. Social Security Administration et al
Filing
61
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 60 Motion for Extension of Time Re: 57 Cross-Motion to Remand. Plaintiff Granted an additional 30 days to file Response. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 10/9/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Case 2:17-cv-02858-GMN-GWF Document 60 Filed 10/05/18 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
Darrin Duhamel
301 Banuelo Drive
Henderson, NV 89014
702.439.8054
darrinduhamel@gmail.com
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
DARRIN DUHAMEL,
9
Plaintiff, pro se
10
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A
RESPONDCE TO DEFENDANT’S
CROSS-MOTION TO REMAND FOR
FURTHER PROCEEDINGS
vs.
11
CASE NO.: 2:17-CV-02858-GMN-GWF
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
12
Defendant
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
I, Darrin Duhamel, the Plaintiff in the above-named proceeding, respectfully move this
Court to provide me with an additional 30 days for which to file my response to the Defendant’s
(Dkt. 57) cross-motion to remand my case back to the Social Security Administration for further
proceedings. While the Defendant has been approved for two extensions of time, this is my first
such request.
On Monday of this week I underwent a minor surgical procedure on my back to implant a
peripheral nerve stimulator directly on the nerve pathways from my lower extremities in the hope
that it will aid in the lessening of my daily pain.
22
23
24
Dated this 5th day of October 2018
/s/ Darrin Duhamel
Darrin Duhamel, Pro se
IT IS SO ORDERED:
25
26
27
28
__________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DATED: 10/09/2018
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?