Heath v. Tristar Products, Inc.
Filing
44
ORDER that the unserved Defendant is severed from this case for discovery and trial pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(b). The 40 Second Stipulation for Extension of Time re Discovery Deadlines is Denied. A 60-day extension is granted and the following deadlines shall apply: Discovery due by 12/17/2018. Motions due by 1/16/2019. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 2/15/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
TAWNDRA L. HEATH,
8
9
10
v.
Case No. 2:17-cv-02869-GMN-PAL
Plaintiff,
ORDER
(Stip Ext Time – ECF No. 40)
TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC.,
Defendant.
11
12
The court conducted a scheduling conference on July 31, 2018, on the parties’ Stipulation
13
and Order to Extend Discovery Deadlines (Second Request) (ECF No. 40). Joshua Dowling
14
appeared on behalf of plaintiff, and Alexandria Layton appeared on behalf of defendant. The court
15
heard from counsel on their request to extend the discovery plan and scheduling order deadlines
16
for 120 days.
17
The complaint in this case was filed in state court and removed November 15, 2017. The
18
parties stipulated to amend the complaint to name the manufacturer as a defendant. Tristar filed
19
an answer to the amended complaint on March 19, 2018. The parties have engaged in some
20
discovery but have not wanted to proceed with depositions until the manufacturer appears.
21
Counsel for plaintiff advised the court that his process server indicates it will likely take between
22
6 months to 2 years for plaintiff to serve the Chinese manufacturer, defendant Zhongshan Jinguang
23
Household Appliance Manufacture Co., under the Hague Convention. The court will not delay
24
discovery for up to two years or more while the plaintiff attempts to obtain service on the
25
manufacturer in China. Counsel advised that they could complete discovery with an additional
26
60-day extension. The court will therefore sever the manufacturer defendant, and give the parties
27
a 60-day extension of the existing deadlines
28
1
1
IT IS ORDERED: The unserved defendant is severed from this case for discovery and
2
trial pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(b) in the interests of convenience, and to expedite proceedings.
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ Stipulation and Order to Extend Discovery
4
Deadlines (Second Request) (ECF No. 40) is DENIED. A 60-day extension is granted and the
5
following deadlines shall apply:
6
1.
Last date to complete discovery: December 17, 2018
7
2.
Last date to amend pleadings and add parties: September 17, 2018
8
3.
Last date to file interim status report: October 17, 2018
9
4.
Last date to disclose experts pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2): October 17, 2018
10
5.
Last date to disclose rebuttal experts: November 16, 2018
11
6.
Last date to file dispositive motions: January 16, 2019
12
7.
Last date to file joint pretrial order: February 15, 2019. In the event dispositive
13
motions are filed, the date for filing the joint pretrial order shall be suspended until 30 days
14
after a decision of the dispositive motions.
15
8.
16
shall be included in the pretrial order.
17
DATED this 2nd day of August, 2018.
The disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3), and any objections thereto,
18
19
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?