Vidal v. Arnold et al

Filing 5

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 4 the Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 1 Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee or file an application to pro ceed in forma pauperis.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 1 -1 the Complaint is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 1/24/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

***

9
10

FRANCISCO VIDAL,

11

Case No. 2:17-cv-02885-RFB-GWF
Plaintiff,
ORDER

12

v.

13

ARNOLD, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15
16
17

Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 4) of the
Honorable George Foley, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge, entered December 28, 2017.

18

A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

19

recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific

20

written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. §

21

636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is

22

required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed

23

findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local

24

Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct

25

“any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge.

26

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due

27

by January 11, 2018. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this

28

case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations.

1
2

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 4) is
ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.

3

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is dismissed

4

without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis.

5

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that The Complaint (ECF No. 1-1) is DISMISSED.

6

The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff.

7
8

DATED: January 24, 2018.
_____________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-