Kurtze v. Lombardo et al

Filing 8

ORDER granting 6 Motion for Voluntary Dismissal. FURTHER ORDERED that 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/21/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 GIOVANNI KURTZE, 10 Case No. 2:17-cv-02886-JCM-CWH Plaintiff, ORDER v. 11 JOSEPH LOMBARDO, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 I. 16 17 18 Plaintiff, a pro se prisoner, previously filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis and submitted a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1, 1-1.) The Court has not yet screened the complaint. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 DISCUSSION Plaintiff now files a motion for voluntary dismissal. (ECF No. 6.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), a plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing “a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Court grants Plaintiff’s motion to voluntarily dismiss this action because no responsive pleading has been filed in this case. Therefore, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice. II. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the motion for voluntary dismissal (ECF No. 6) is granted. 28 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is dismissed in its entirety without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) is denied as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. 7 8 DATED THIS Septemberday of 21, 2018. 2018. 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?