Pochampally v. Booth et al

Filing 17

ORDER Granting 16 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 10 Motion to Dismiss and 12 Motion to Change Venue (Second Request). Responses due by 1/24/2018. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/12/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

1
2
3
4
5

Radhika Pochampally
9811 W. Charleston Dr
Suite 2
Las Vegas, NV – 89117
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 504.910.9837
Email:[e-mail]
Plaintiff In Pro Per
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7
8
9

RADHIKA POCHAMPALLY,
an individual

10

Plaintiff,

11
vs.

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

JANE C. ETTINGER BOOTH,
an individual,
And
BOOTH & BOOTH, APLC,
and DOES 1 through 50 inclusive,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-02895-JCM-NJK

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS AND/OR
MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE;
ORDER (SECOND REQUEST)

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto that Plaintiff,

2

RADHIKA POCHAMPALLY may have additional time within which to respond to Defendant’s

3

Motion to Dismiss and/or Motion to Transfer Venue (Dkts 10,12 and 13).

4

Therefore, the last day for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and/or Motion to

5

Transfer Venue is Wednesday, January 24th 2018.

6

Good cause exists for this extension as Plaintiff in Pro Per has a family emergency to tend

7
8
9

to and had be travel out of the State unexpectedly. This document is being electronically filed
through the Court’s ECF System. In this regard, Plaintiff hereby attests that (1) the content of this

10

document is acceptable to all persons required to sign the document; (2) Defendant’s counsel has

11

concurred with the filing of this document; and (3) a record supporting this concurrence is

12

available for inspection or production if so ordered.

13
14
15

DATED: January 9th 2018

Respectfully submitted,

16
17
18

RADHIKA POCHAMPALLY

19

By /s/ Radhika Pochampally

20
21

Plaintiff in Pro Se
DATED: January 9th 2018

Lipson Neilson Cole Seltzer, Garin, P.C.

22
By: /s/ Kaleb D. Anderson, Esq.
KALEB D. ANDERSON
Attorneys for Defendants
JANE C. ETTINGER BOOTH
And BOOTH and BOOTH APLC

23
24
25
26
27
28

2

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2
3

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

4

RADHIKA POCHAMPALLY,
an individual

5

Plaintiff,

6
7

vs.

8

JANE C. ETTINGER BOOTH,
an individual,

9

And

10
11

BOOTH & BOOTH, APLC,
and DOES 1 through 50 inclusive,

12

Defendants.

13
14
15
16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case Number: 2:17-cv-02895
JUDGE: JCM-NJK
PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
AND OR MOTION TO TRANSFER
VENUE (SECOND REQUEST)

ORDER

17
18
19

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Plaintiff should respond

20

to Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss and/or Motion to Transfer Venue (Dkts 10,12 and 13)

21

on or before Wednesday, January 24th , 2018.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

January 12, 2018
DATED: __________

_____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT