Ames v. Caesars Entertainment Corporation et al
Filing
17
ORDER Granting 15 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Richard Fama for Caesars Entertainment Corporation and Rio Properties LLC and approving Designation of Local Counsel Lewis Brandon, Jr. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/29/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
Jay Ames, Individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated;
JO
Plaintiff(s),
11
12
vs.
Caesars Entertainment Corporation d.b.a.
Rio All-Suits Hotel and Casino, et al.
13
Defendant(s).
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case #2:17-cv-02910-GMN-VCF
VERIFIED PETITION FOR
PERMISSION TO PRACTICE
IN THIS CASE ONLY BY
ATTORNEY NOT ADMITTED
TO THE BAR OF THIS COURT
AND DESIGNATION OF
LOCAL COUNSEL
FILING FEE IS $250.00
14
15
16
17
--~-R_i_·c_h_ai~·d_F~a~m_a~---' Petitioner, respectfully represents to the Court:
(name of petitioner)
1.
That Petitioner is an attorney at law and a member of the law firm of
18
Cozen O'Connor
(firm name)
19
_____________________
45 Broadway, 16th Floor
(street address)
20
with offices at
21
_________
N_e_w_Y_o_rl_<_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,N_e_w_Y_o_r_k_"7".,--,-------~l::J-·1-,-~l~0_0_06 ~
__
(city)
(state)
(zip code)
22
23
24
25
------------~---':_,_
212 908-1229
(area code+ telephone number)
2.
~
rfama@cozen.com
(Email address)
That Petitioner has been retained personally or as a member of the law firm by
26
Caesars Ente1tainment Corp & Rio Prop., LLC
[client(s)]
27
the above-entitled case now pending before this Court.
28
to provide legal representation in connection with
Rev. 5/16
3.
That since
June 22, 1994
, Petitioner has been and presently is a
~date)
B
3
member in good standing of the bar o the highest Cami of the State of New York
(state)
where Petitioner regularly practices law. Petitioner shall attach a certificate from the state bar or
4
from the clerk of the supreme coutt or highest admitting court of each state, territory, or insular
5
possession of the United States in which the applicant bas been admitted to practice law cettifying
6
the applicant's membership therein is in good standing.
2
7
4.
That Petitioner was admitted to practice before the following United States District
8
Courts, United States Circuit Courts of Appeal, the Supreme Comt of the United States and Courts
9
of other States on the dates indicated for each, and that Petitioner is presently a member in good
10
standing of the bars of said Courts.
Date Admitted
11
Cami
12
New York State Supreme Court
June 22, 1994
13
USDC for the Southern District of NY
August 11, 1998
14
USDC for the Eastern District of NY
August 6, 1998
15
USDC for the Western District of NY
July 12, 2011
16
USDC/Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit
Bar Number
January 2, 2009
2624054
17
18
19
5.
That there are or have been no disciplinary proceedings instituted against petitioner,
20
nor any suspension of any license, certificate or privilege to appear before any judicial, regulatory
21
or administrative body, or any resignation or termination in order to avoid disciplinary or
22
disbarment proceedings, except as described in detail below:
23
24
(State "none" if Petitioner has no disciplinary proceedings, etc.)
None.
25
26
27
28
2
Rev. 5/16
6.
That Petitioner has never been denied admission to the State Bar of Nevada. (Give
2
particulars if ever denied admission):
3
(State "none" if Petitioner has never been denied admission.)
None.
4
5
6
7
8
9
JO
7.
That Petitioner is a member of good standing in the following Bar Associations.
(State "none" if Petitioner is not a member of other Bar Associations.)
New York State Supreme Cou1t
USDC for the Southern, Eastern, and Western Districts ofNew York
USDC, Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
8.
Petitioner has filed application(s) to appear as counsel under Local Rule IA 11-2
11
(formerly LR IA 10-2) during the past three (3) years
12
Date of Application
in the following matters: (State "none" if no applications.)
Title of Court
Administrative Body
or Arbitrator
Cause
13
14
Was Application
Granted or
Denied
r:
r:
None
15
16
r:
17
):
18
r:
19
20
(lf necessary, please attach a statement of additional applications)
9.
Petitioner consents to the jurisdiction of the courts and disciplinary boards of the
21
State of Nevada with respect to the law of this state governing the conduct of attorneys to the same
22
extent as a member of the State Bar of Nevada.
23
24
25
26
10.
Petitioner agrees to comply with the standards of professional conduct required of
the members of the bar of this court.
11.
Petitioner has disclosed in writing to the client that the applicant is not admitted to
practice in this jurisdiction and that the client has consented to such representation.
27
28
3
Rev.5/16
That Petitioner respectfully prays that Petitioner be admitted to practice before this Court
2
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS CASE ONLY.
3
4
STATE OF New York
5
6
B)
Petitioner's signature
)
COUNTY OF_~N'""e""w~Y~o=rk~-)
7
8
That the foregoing statements are true.
9
10
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
II
,..;2-0/
12
7
13
14
15
16
DESIGNATION OF RESIDENT ATTORNEY ADMITTED TO
THE BAR OF THIS COURT AND CONSENT THERETO.
17
Pursuant to the requirements of the Local Rules of Practice for this Court, the Petitioner
18
believes it to be in the best interests of the client(s) to designate
19
Lew Brandon
(name of local counsel)
Attorney at Law, member of the State of Nevada and previously admitted to practice before the
20
above-entitled Court as associate resident counsel in this action. The address and email address of
21
22
23
24
25
26
said designated Nevada counsel is:
Moran Brandon Bendavid Moran, 630 South 4th Street
(street address)
_ _ _ _ _ _L,a_s~V~eg~a_s_ _ _ _ _ _ ,,~N_e~v~a~d~a--~-.,-,.-----____,G,_..,...,.89~1_0~1~(city)
(state)
(zip code)
702 384-8424
(area code+ telephone number)
l.brandon@moranlawfirm.com
(Email address)
27
28
4
Rev. 5/16
By this designation the petitioner and undersigned party(ies) agree that this designation constitutes
2
agreement and authorization for the designated resident admitted counsel to sign stipulations
3
binding on all of us.
4
5
APPOINTMENT OF DESIGNATED RESIDENT NEVADA COUNSEL
6
7
8
The undersigned party(ies) appoint(s) ----.,.---L-=-e,.....w
_B_,,r_a_n_d_on~----- as
(name of local counsel)
hi s/her/their Designated Resident Nevada C nsel in this case.
9
10
l arty' signature)
-e- t-r'i f ~/)N:;;...
11
(type or p rint patty name, title) /
12
13
(patty's s ignature)
14
15
(type or print party name, title)
16
17
CONSENT OF DE
T he undersigned hereby consents to se
GNEE
as associate res ident Nevada counsel in this case.
18
19
20
21
Bar number
l.brandon@moranlawfi rm.com
Emai 1 address
22
23
APPROVED:
24
Dated: this _29 _ day of _ December ___, 20 17 .
_
_ _ __
25
26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
5
Rev. 5/ 16
2
EXHIBIT ''1''
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MORAN BRANDON
BENDAVID MORAN
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
630 Sou I H 4! HS! HEE r
LAS VEGAS. NEVADA 89101
PHONE:(702) 384-8424
FAX: (702) 384-6568
EXHIBIT ''1''
J\pp.efutt.e iliuininu nf f!J.e &;upr.em.e QJ:nurl
nf t!J.e &;tnt.e nf N.ew fnrk
&;.ernuh 3Juhitinl il.eparlm.eut
C!rlerk of fqe Appellate IDiuision of tt,e
§upreme C!rourf of fl7e §fate of
bo
qere by
~cw
certify f q at
11fork, §econh Jluhidul IDepurfment,
was buly
1!U.clfurb lJl'umu
licenseh unh ubmitfeb to practice us an Attorney unh C!rnunselor-ut-llimu
in all tqe courts of tl7e elute, uccnrbing tn tqe lams of tqe §lute unb tqe
court rules unh orhers, on tqe 22 uh
buy of
Jluue 1BB4,
qus buly fatten unb sub.scribeb tqe nutq of nffice prescribeli by law, qus
been enrolleb in tqe iitoll nf i\ttnrneys unli @nunselor.s-ut-lliuw on file ht
my office, J7u.s buly regi.stereh wifq fqe ubministrufiue office of tqe
courf.s, unb uccorhing tn tl7e recnrhs of tqis court is in gonh sfunbing us
un i\ftorneu unb @ounselor-ut-14mu.
lln lililitnenn lililqereof, 11 1111 u e 11ere1111 to s ct
my qnni'l nni'l nffixei'l tqe seal of s11ii'l
AppeUnfa '!!liuisiou 011 '!!letemher 27, 2017.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?