Dittmar v. City of North Las Vegas
Filing
186
Order Resolving and Ruling on Objections to Designated Deposition Testimony (ECF Nos. 184 , 185 ). (See pdf order for specifics.) Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 2/5/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3 Pamela Dittmar,
4
Plaintiff
5 v.
Case No.: 2:17-cv-02916-JAD-BNW
Order Resolving Defendant’s Objections to
Designated Deposition Testimony
6 City of North Las Vegas,
7
[ECF No. 184]
Defendant
8
In the notices of deposition designations, the parties provided their objections to
9 designated deposition testimony. 1 Attached are the court’s rulings on defendant City of North
10 Las Vegas’s page-and-line objections, denoted next to the objection on the appropriate line of the
11 notice. The court will address the defendant’s “general-concerns” objections at today’s pretrial
12 conference.
13
Whether addressed by these rulings or not, when presenting deposition testimony at trial,
14 counsel must:
15
•
Exclude the internal objections and any discussion about or response thereto; and
16
•
Exclude attorney-to-attorney colloquy.
17
_______________________________
U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey
February 5, 2024
18
19
20
21
22
23
1
ECF No. 184 (defendant’s objections); ECF No. 185 (plaintiff’s objections).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
KAMER ZUCKER ABBOTT
R. Todd Creer
#10016
Kaitlin H. Paxton
#13625
6325 South Jones Boulevard, Suite 300
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102-1990
Tel: (702) 259-8640
Fax: (702) 259-8646
tcreer@kzalaw.com
kpaxton@kzalaw.com
Attorneys for Defendant
City of North Las Vegas
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
PAMELA DITTMAR,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, a municipal )
corporation,
)
)
Defendant.
)
______________________________________ )
Case No. 2:17-cv-02916-JAD-BNW
COURT'S RULING ON
DEFENDANT CITY OF NORTH LAS
VEGAS’S OBJECTIONS TO
PLAINTIFF’S TRANSCRIPT
DESIGNATIONS FOR QIONG LIU’S
FEBRUARY 26, 2019 DEPOSITION
15
Pursuant to the Court’s January 17, 2024 Order Regarding Trial [ECF No. 163], Defendant
16
City of North Las Vegas (“the City” or “Defendant”), by and through its counsel of record, the law
17
firm of Kamer Zucker Abbott, submits the following objections to Plaintiff Pamela Dittmar’s
18
deposition designations for former City Manager for Defendant Qiong Liu [ECF No. 178].
19
As raised in the City’s Transcript Designations for Qiong Liu’s Deposition [ECF No. 169] and
20
its Trial Brief [ECF No. 168], Defendant objects to the submission of Liu’s deposition transcript at
21
trial, as Plaintiff’s sole reason for requesting the trial be continued from its September 2023 date was
22
due to Liu’s unavailability for the entire month of September, and Liu’s designation by Plaintiff as her
23
“key witness.” If, in fact, Liu never intended to make herself available for the trial while residing out
24
of state, the trial was unnecessarily delayed. Defendant has been prejudiced by that delay, resulting in
KAMER ZUCKER ABBOTT
Attorneys at Law
6325 South Jones Boulevard, Suite 300 • Las Vegas, NV 89118 • (702) 259-8640
Page 1 of 8
1
additional costs for trial preparation.
2
Further, Plaintiff’s designations should be excluded from trial because she missed the filing
3
deadline of Monday, January 29, 2024 at 12:00 p.m. by more than a day. Indeed, Plaintiff’s designations
4
were not filed until Tuesday, January 30, 2024 at 9:37 p.m. The parties were expressly cautioned in the
5
Order Regarding Trial that failure to provide the designations by the deadline could result in exclusion
6
of the testimony from trial. ECF No. 163 at 2-3. Further, such delay resulted in Defendant having
7
significantly less time to review the designations and prepare these objections.
8
9
Notwithstanding Defendant’s general concerns with the use of Liu’s deposition testimony at
trial, Defendant offers the following objections to Plaintiff’s designations:
10
1. P. 15, ll. 13-15 – Leading; OVERRULED
11
2. P. 15, ll. 16-18 – Asked and Answered; OVERRULED
12
3. P. 15, l. 19 through p. 16, l. 6 – Leading; OVERRULED
13
4. P. 18, l. 22 through p. 19, l. 1 – Improper characterization of evidence;
OVERRULED
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
5. P. 19, ll. 2-8 – Leading; SUSTAINED as to ll. 4-6; OVERRULED as to the rest
6. P. 19, ll. 9-21 – Leading; improper characterization of evidence; calls for legal
conclusion; SUSTAINED
7. P. 20, ll. 5-8 – Improper characterization of evidence; OVERRULED
8. P. 20, ll. 9-24 – Leading; improper characterization of evidence; calls for legal
conclusion; SUSTAINED
9. P. 20, l. 25 through p. 21, l. 2 – Leading; misstates testimony; OVERRULED
10. P. 22, ll. 19-21 – Leading, asked and answered; OVERRULED
11. P. 23, ll. 3-7 – Hearsay within hearsay; SUSTAINED
12. P. 23, ll. 13-14 – Hearsay; SUSTAINED
13. P. 23, ll. 15-19 – Hearsay within hearsay; SUSTAINED
KAMER ZUCKER ABBOTT
Attorneys at Law
6325 South Jones Boulevard, Suite 300 • Las Vegas, NV 89118 • (702) 259-8640
Page 2 of 8
1
14. P. 23, l. 23 through P. 24, l. 12*1 - Leading; calls for speculation; argumentative;
2
15. P. 24, ll. 14-18 – Incomplete designation that lacks a question; calls for speculation;
OVERRULED
SUSTAINED
3
16. P. 24, ll. 19-24 – Leading; argumentative; SUSTAINED
4
17. P. 25, ll. 6-13 – Unresponsive; OVERRULED
5
18. P. 26, l. 21 through 27, l. 4 – Unresponsive; hearsay; OVERRULED
6
19. P. 27, ll. 5-9 – Leading; OVERRULED
7
20. P. 27, l. 23 through p. 28, l. 19 – Hearsay; OVERRULED
8
21. P. 29, 7 through p. 30, l. 9 – Unresponsive; SUSTAINED - except for P. 29, ll. 7-14
through the word "change."
9
10
22. P. 30, l. 24 through p. 31, l. 21 – Leading; argumentative; OVERRULED
11
23. P. 32, l. 21 through p. 33, l. 7 – Speculative; irrelevant; OVERRULED
12
24. P. 33, ll. 19-25 – Lacks foundation, assumes facts not in evidence; SUSTAINED
13
25. P. 34, ll. 5-13 – Leading, calls for speculation; OVERRULED
26. P. 35, ll. 14-15 – Hearsay; SUSTAINED
14
27. P. 36, l. 20 through p. 37, l. 3 – Unresponsive; SUSTAINED
15
28. P. 37, ll. 8-10 – Misstates testimony; leading; OVERRULED
16
29. P. 37, ll. 12-21 – Unresponsive; SUSTAINED
17
30. P. 37, l. 22 through p. 38, l. 4 – Leading; OVERRULED
18
31. P. 38, ll. 5-12 – Leading; calls for legal conclusion; argumentative; improper
19
characterization of evidence; SUSTAINED
20
32. P. 39, ll. 4-9 – Leading, misstates testimony; OVERRULED as to ll. 4-5; SUSTAINED as
to ll. 6-9.
21
22
33. P. 39, ll. 19-23 – Unresponsive; SUSTAINED
23
34. P. 39, l. 24 through p. 40, l. 3 – Irrelevant; speculative; OVERRULED
24
1
Plaintiff’s list of designations does not include all of the lines highlighted in Plaintiff’s accompanying
transcript. To the extent she intended to include the additional highlighted lines, Defendant includes
objections to certain lines.
KAMER ZUCKER ABBOTT
Attorneys at Law
6325 South Jones Boulevard, Suite 300 • Las Vegas, NV 89118 • (702) 259-8640
Page 3 of 8
1
35. P. 40, ll. 4-12 – Unresponsive; speculative; OVERRULED
2
36. P. 40, ll. 13-19 – Leading; OVERRULED
3
37. P. 40, l. 20 through p. 41, l. 1 – Speculative; SUSTAINED
4
38. P. 41, ll. 1-4 – Leading; SUSTAINED
5
39. P. 42, l. 24 through 43, l. 4 – Leading; calls for a legal conclusion; improper
6
characterization of evidence; SUSTAINED
7
40. P. 43, ll. 12-13 – Unresponsive; SUSTAINED
8
41. P. 43, l. 24 through p. 44, l. 14 – Leading; misstates testimony; SUSTAINED
9
42. P. 45, ll. 1-13 – Leading; speculative; SUSTAINED as to ll. 1-8; OVERRULED as
to ll. 9-13.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
43. P. 47, ll. 4-9 – Leading; SUSTAINED
44. P. 47, ll. 10-19 – Calls for speculation; SUSTAINED
45. P. 47, ll. 20-22 – Leading; argumentative; SUSTAINED
46. P. 48, ll. 3-11 – Hearsay; asked and answered; OVERRULED
47. P. 48, ll. 12-21 – Leading; SUSTAINED
48. P. 49, ll. 5-20 – Misstates testimony; speculative; OVERRULED
49. P. 49, ll. 21-24 – Leading; OVERRULED
50. P. 49, l. 25 through p. 50, l. 6 – Calls for speculation; SUSTAINED
51. P. 50, l. 19 through p. 51, l. 9 – Hearsay; speculative; SUSTAINED
52. P. 51, ll. 20-21 – Speculative; SUSTAINED
53. P. 53; ll. 10-21 – Irrelevant; unresponsive; hearsay; OVERRULED
54. P. 55, ll. 6-11 – Incomplete designation that is lacking the question for context;
speculative; SUSTAINED
55. P. 55, ll. 12-13 – Attorney is testifying for the witness; SUSTAINED
56. P. 55, ll. 14-19 – Speculative; SUSTAINED
KAMER ZUCKER ABBOTT
Attorneys at Law
6325 South Jones Boulevard, Suite 300 • Las Vegas, NV 89118 • (702) 259-8640
Page 4 of 8
1
57. P. 56, ll. 6-10 – Leading, argumentative; OVERRULED
2
58. P. 57, ll. 1-4 – Unresponsive; SUSTAINED
3
59. P. 58, ll. 14-17 – Compound; Leading; SUSTAINED
4
60. P. 58, l. 18 through p. 60, l. 6 – Unresponsive; SUSTAINED
5
61. P. 61, ll. 2-11 – Leading; calls for speculation; SUSTAINED
6
62. P. 61, ll. 16-21 – Leading; unresponsive; SUSTAINED
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
63. P. 62, ll. 1-6 – Calls for speculation; SUSTAINED
64. P. 62, 7-19 – Leading; unresponsive; speculative; assumes facts not in evidence;
SUSTAINED
65. P. 62, l. 20 through p. 63, l. 6 – Leading; speculative; assumes facts not in evidence;
SUSTAINED
66. P. 63, l. 14 through p. 64, l. 2 – Calls for speculation; asked and answered; SUSTAINED
67. P. 64, ll. 10-16 – Leading; OVERRULED
68. P. 65, l. 22 through p. 66, l. 7 – Leading; SUSTAINED
69. P. 67, l. 22 through p. 68, l. 11 – Unresponsive; SUSTAINED
70. P. 68, ll. 16-19 – Unresponsive; SUSTAINED
71. P. 68, l. 20 through p. 69, l. 7 – Leading; SUSTAINED
72. P. 69, ll. 15-25 – Hearsay within hearsay; speculative; SUSTAINED
17
73. P. 70, ll. 3-10 – Leading, calls for legal conclusion; calls for speculation; SUSTAINED
18
74. P. 70, ll. 14-22 – Unresponsive; SUSTAINED
19
75. P. 70, l. 23 through p. 71, l. 8 – Leading; SUSTAINED
20
76. P. 71, ll. 9-13 – Leading; calls for legal conclusion; SUSTAINED
21
77. P. 71, l. 14 through p. 72, l. 21 – Leading; OVERRULED as to P. 71, ll. 14-24 through
22
23
24
the word "them," SUSTAINED as to the rest.
78. P. 72, l. 23 through p. 73, l. 9 – Unresponsive; OVERRULED
79. P. 73, ll. 10-21 – Irrelevant; hearsay; SUSTAINED
80. P. 73, l. 22 through p. 75, l. 22 – Assumes facts not in evidence; calls for speculation;
KAMER ZUCKER ABBOTT
Attorneys at Law
6325 South Jones Boulevard, Suite 300 • Las Vegas, NV 89118 • (702) 259-8640
Page 5 of 8
1
unresponsive; hearsay; SUSTAINED
2
81. P. 75, l. 23 through p. 76, l. 5 – Hearsay; OVERRULED
3
82. P. 76; ll. 6-7 – Unresponsive; SUSTAINED
4
83. P. 77, l. 7 through p. 78, l. 8 – Topic of spoliation subject to dispute argued within trial briefs;
5
6
7
irrelevant; more prejudicial than probative; OVERRULED
84. P. 79, ll. 2-12 – Hearsay; SUSTAINED
85. P. 80, ll. 15-25 – Hearsay; leading; lacks foundation; more prejudicial than probative;
SUSTAINED
8
86. P. 81, ll. 12-20 – Hearsay; leading; SUSTAINED
9
87. P. 83, ll. 1-11 – Hearsay within hearsay; SUSTAINED
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
88. P. 83, l. 22 through p. 84, l. 6 – Hearsay; leading; irrelevant; speculative; in violation of the
order on motion in limine as it is lacking presentation of proof SUSTAINED
89. P. 84, l. 20 through p. 85, l. 5 – Hearsay; leading; irrelevant; speculative; in violation of the
order on motion in limine as it is lacking presentation of proof; SUSTAINED
90. P. 85, l. 24 through p. 86, l. 3 – Hearsay; leading; lacks foundation; OVERRULED
91. P. 88, l. 22 through p. 89, l. 3 – Hearsay; leading; irrelevant; speculative; in violation of the
order on motion in limine as it is lacking presentation of proof and references the EMRB
trasncript; lacks foundation from prior lines that are also in violation; SUSTAINED
92. P. 90, l. 19 through p. 91, l. 6 – Calls for speculation; leading; assumes facts not in
evidence; unresponsive; SUSTAINED
19
93. P. 91, ll. 18-23 – Calls for speculation; SUSTAINED
20
94. P. 94, ll. 14-22 – Unresponsive; speculative; SUSTAINED
21
95. P. 99, ll. 16-23 – Speculative; hearsay; OVERRULED
22
96. P. 109, l. 20 through p. 110, l. 25 – Unresponsive; OVERRULED
23
97. P. 111, l. 17 through p. 112, l. 24 – Unresponsive; OVERRULED
24
KAMER ZUCKER ABBOTT
Attorneys at Law
6325 South Jones Boulevard, Suite 300 • Las Vegas, NV 89118 • (702) 259-8640
Page 6 of 8
1
98. P. 118, l. 8 through 119, l. 8 – Unresponsive; speculative; SUSTAINED
2
99. P. 124, l. 23 through p. 125, l. 2 – Unresponsive; in violation of the order on motion in
3
4
limine as it is lacking presentation of proof SUSTAINED
100.
P. 126, l. 19 through p. 127, l. 3 – Unresponsive; SUSTAINED
5
101. P. 130, l. 131, l. 18 – Unresponsive; OVERRULED (no line number given for start of
range)
6
102.
7
P. 136, l. 12-21 – Compound; leading; SUSTAINED
DATED this 2nd day of February, 2024.
8
Respectfully submitted,
9
KAMER ZUCKER ABBOTT
By:
10
11
12
13
/s/Kaitlin H. Paxton
R. Todd Creer
#10016
Kaitlin H. Paxton
#13625
6325 South Jones Boulevard, Suite 300
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
Tel: (702) 259-8640
Fax: (702) 259-8646
Attorneys for Defendant
City of North Las Vegas
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
KAMER ZUCKER ABBOTT
Attorneys at Law
6325 South Jones Boulevard, Suite 300 • Las Vegas, NV 89118 • (702) 259-8640
Page 7 of 8
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?