Iwaniszek v. Pride Transport, Inc.

Filing 10

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 8 Plaintiff Steven J. Iwaniszek's Motion to Extend Time is GRANTED. Mr. Iwaniszek shall have until 4/19/19, to file an amended complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Iwaniszek shall file a certificate of interested parties as required by LR 7.1-1 of the Local Rules of Practice by 4/19/19. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 3/19/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 STEVEN J. IWANISZEK, 8 Case No. 2:17-cv-02918-JCM-PAL Plaintiff, ORDER v. 9 PRIDE TRANSPORT INC., 10 (Mot. Extend Time – ECF No. 8) Defendant. 11 12 This matter is before the court on pro se Plaintiff Steven J. Iwaniszek’s Motion to Extend 13 Time (ECF No. 8). 14 § 636(b)(1)(A) and LR IB 1-3 of the Local Rules of Practice. This motion is referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 15 On February 13, 2019, the court issued a Screening Order (ECF No. 4) dismissing Mr. 16 Iwaniszek’s complaint without prejudice and granting leave to file an amended complaint by 17 March 14, 2019.1 The court also ordered Iwaniszek to comply with LR 7.1-1 of the Local Rules 18 of Practice by filing a certificate of interested parties by March 14. The court stated that Mr. 19 Iwaniszek’s failure to comply with the screening order by submitting an amended complaint and 20 certificate of interested parties before the March 14 deadline would result in a recommendation to 21 the district judge that this case be dismissed. 22 On March 14, Mr. Iwaniszek filed a document stating, “I Stephen J. Iwaniszek, ask the 23 court and submit a written motion to extend my filing and complaint.” Although not formally 24 titled as a “motion,” it is clear that he requests additional time to comply with the screening order. 25 26 27 28 Having reviewed and considered the matter, and good cause appearing, 1 In a separate Report of Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 6), the undersigned recommended that Plaintiff’s IFP application be denied, that he be required to pay the $400.00 filing fee, and that his failure to do so within the time set by the district judge should result in dismissal of this action. Plaintiff had until February 27, 2019, to file an objection. He did not do so before the deadline expired. The current motion only requests relief related to the deadline to file an amended complaint. 1 1 IT IS ORDERED: 2 1. Plaintiff Steven J. Iwaniszek’s Motion to Extend Time (ECF No. 8) is GRANTED. 3 2. Mr. Iwaniszek shall have until April 19, 2019, to file an amended complaint correcting 4 5 6 the deficiencies noted in the Screening Order (ECF No. 4). 3. Mr. Iwaniszek shall file a certificate of interested parties as required by LR 7.1-1 of the Local Rules of Practice by April 19, 2019. 7 4. This order only extends the deadlines for submitting an amended complaint and 8 certificate of interested parties. Iwaniszek is still required to comply with any and all 9 other instructions and legal standards stated in the Screening Order (ECF No. 4). 10 5. Mr. Iwaniszek’s failure to comply with this order by submitting an amended complaint 11 and certificate of interested parties before the April 19, 2019 deadline will result in a 12 recommendation to the district judge that this case be dismissed. 13 Dated this 19th day of March, 2019. 14 ___________________________________ PEGGY A. LEEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?